My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
COMPLIANCE INFO_JTD 9/3/2025
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
W
>
WAVERLY
>
6484
>
4400 - Solid Waste Program
>
PR0440004
>
COMPLIANCE INFO_JTD 9/3/2025
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/6/2025 11:06:20 AM
Creation date
10/6/2025 9:32:22 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
4400 - Solid Waste Program
File Section
COMPLIANCE INFO
FileName_PostFix
JTD 9/3/2025
RECORD_ID
PR0440004
PE
4433 - LANDFILL DISPOSAL SITE
FACILITY_ID
FA0004517
FACILITY_NAME
FOOTHILL LANDFILL
STREET_NUMBER
6484
Direction
N
STREET_NAME
WAVERLY
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
LINDEN
Zip
95236
APN
09344002
CURRENT_STATUS
Active, billable
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\cfield
Supplemental fields
Site Address
6484 N WAVERLY RD LINDEN 95236
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
1437
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
WASTE DISCHARGE REQUIREMENTS ORDER R5-2015-0058-01 -22- <br />SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS <br />FOOTHILL SANITARY LANDFILL, INC. <br />FOOTHILL LANDFILL <br />SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY <br /> <br />Landfill 2 <br />93. Previous WDRs Order R5-2003-0020 approved an EAD to the Title 27/Subtitle D <br />prescriptive liner design for an MSW landfill proposed by the Discharger for the <br />containment systems of LF-2, Module 1 and future expansion modules at the site. <br />The approved EAD included the following elements:9 <br />Component Base Liner Side Slopes <br />Operations Layer 2 feet soil <br />Filter Fabric Geotextile1 <br />Geocomposite2 <br />LCRS <br />9-inch gravel drainage layer <br />4-inch HDPE collection piping in <br />drainage troughs <br />Base Liner 60-mil HDPE3 <br />Geosynthetic Clay Liner (GCL) <br />Foundation Layer Prepared subgrade <br />≥ 1 foot Thickness not specified <br /> <br />1. Geotextile consists of 8 oz/yd2 non-woven fabric. <br />2. Geonet with above geotextile on both sides. <br />3. HDPE double-side textured. <br />In authorizing the above EAD for the landfill’s containment system, previous WDRs <br />found that the Discharger had made the requisite demonstration under Title 27, <br />Section 20080(b) that construction of the prescriptive design was infeasible and that <br />the proposed EAD met Title 27 performance standards. See Information Sheet. <br />94. The first phase of Module 1 (M-1A) was constructed in 2003 in accordance with the <br />above EAD. M-1A consisted of a 34-acre expansion of the landfill footprint <br />immediately south of LF-1. Excavation side slopes were graded to 1H:1V, forming <br />the sides of native soil berms constructed around the module. The foundation layer <br />was graded from northwest (267 feet MSL) to the southeast (225 feet MSL) at a <br />slope of 3%. Anchor trenches were cut into the northern and southern perimeter <br />berms to anchor the liner. <br />95. The second phase of Module 1 (M-1B), constructed in 2006, consisted of a northward <br />extension of the landfill footprint over a native soil berm between LF-1 and LF-2 and <br />the filling of wastes up against the lower slopes of unlined unit LF-1. A geomembrane <br />barrier layer was installed in the area of overlap between the two modules as a <br />corrective action measure to help prevent leachate and gas migration into LF-1.10 <br /> <br />9. Under Title 27, section 20080(b), the Discharger may construct an engineered alternative to the Title 27 <br />prescriptive standard provided that the requisite demonstration is made (e.g., that the design meets Title <br />27 performance standards and that compliance with the prescriptive standard is not feasible). <br />10.The geomembrane barrier layer was not a construction requirement because the landfill was considered <br />a single unit under previous WDRs and therefore the overlap area did not constitute an expansion of the <br />landfill footprint under Title 27/Subtitle D. See Finding 96.b and Title 27, section 20164.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.