Laserfiche WebLink
l � <br /> UNLARmplax Tech Alensojor CImm,.rru,;a, wStsuas Sail sme wo,;12016 <br /> 4.2.2. PCB Ground Water Sample Results <br /> Because PCBs were detected in some subsurface soil samples in me Eastern GSA debris <br /> burial [reach area, DOE LLNL collected grand water samples for PCB analysis boom wells <br /> located near and/or downipment farm the boreholes in which the PCBs were detected. Ground <br /> water samples collected from wells W-26R-01, -03, -04, -05, -07, and -11, and W-25NA1 and - <br /> 24 were analyzed for PCBs using EPA Method 8082A (Figure 16). '1 he PCB analytical results <br /> Bar around water samples collected from these wells am presented in Table 5. An attempt to <br /> sample well W-26R-05 on December 3, 2014 was unsuccessful due m insufficient water. In <br /> addition, ground water samples were collected tram well W-7P, located N the vicinity of the <br /> Central GSA debris burial trench 113 and analyzed for PCBs to determine if PCBs may have been <br /> released to ground water hum this Cement GSA debris burial [rencb. Because debris burial <br /> rench 03 and nearby well W-21) are not located in the Faster GSA debris burial trench area and <br /> therefore arc not relevant to the forum GSA debris burial bench characterization summarized in <br /> the Tech Memo, well W-'IP is not shown on Figure 16. <br /> Analytical results indicate that PCBs were not detected in any of the ground water samples <br /> above the 0.5 µg/L reporting limit, including the sample collected from Central GSA well W-V. <br /> 5, Data Evaluation <br /> Analytical data obtained for the subsurface sail samples collected in the debris burial bench <br /> am werse evaluated fin SVOC, PA I, and PCB concentrations according to the data evaluation <br /> process outlined in the "Cbaructerizatiou Work Plan Or SubamGce Soil in the Easter General <br /> Services Area Debris Burial Trenches;' and agreed to with the regulatory agencies. In the Work <br /> Plan, a series of hhhen scenarios were presented by which the soil data would be evaluated to <br /> determine the next sups to be taken. This section presents those Work Plan scenarios with a <br /> discussion of due data evaluation that was conducted based on the actual data collected. <br /> The if%then scenarios specified and agreed to in the Work Plan included: <br /> I. The results of the subsurface mil sampling in the Easter GSA debris burial trench seem <br /> to be considered as sufficient evidence that there is no risk to human health or threat to <br /> ground water associated with these constituents if: <br /> • SVOCs, PAIIs, and PCBs am not detected at concentrations above the analytical <br /> reporting limit in any subsurface soil sample. <br /> • The samples include soil collected near mewl debris encountered in the boreholes. <br /> Therefore, the investigation of the Eastern GSA Debris Burial Trenches is considered <br /> completed and no further action (i.e., additional soil sampling) for these constituents is <br /> realest. <br /> Dula Evaluallon: No SVOCs or PAHs were detected in subsurface soil samples at <br /> commutations above their respective analytical method RL,, therefore no further <br /> evaluation ofthese constituents was conducted. PCBs detected at concentrations above <br /> the analytical method RL did not exceed their respective regulatory screening levels. <br />