Laserfiche WebLink
through 7, 2015, Cardno ATC conducted the pilot test described in the workplan. The results of the <br /> sampling conducted during the well installation and the results of the pilot test were submitted in the <br /> Pilot Test Summary Report, dated August 4, 2015. <br /> On January 13, 2015, Cardno ATC supervised the installation of monitoring well MW-23 into the deep <br /> water bearing zone to 60 feet bgs. No hydrocarbons were detected in soil samples collected. The work <br /> was performed in accordance with Cardno ATC's Workplan for Additional Soil and Groundwater <br /> Assessment, dated August 12, 2014. <br /> On September 21 through 28, 2017, ATC supervised the installation of six air sparge wells (AS-2 through <br /> AS-7). The work was performed in accordance with ATC's Remedial Action Plan,dated June 14, 2017. The <br /> results of the soil sampling analysis were presented in ATC's Well Installation Report dated November 14, <br /> 2017. <br /> On October 3 and 4, 2017, ATC supervised the installation of two off-site groundwater monitoring wells <br /> (MW-24 and MW-25). The work was performed in accordance with ATC's Workplan for Additional Soil <br /> and Groundwater Assessment, dated May 8, 2017. The well installation activities and results of the soil <br /> sampling analysis were presented in ATC's Well Installation Report, dated November 14, 2017. <br /> On November 16,2020,ATC collected two grab surface water samples from Five Mile Creek in accordance <br /> with correspondence from the RWQCB dated August 18,2020. One sample was collected west-northwest <br /> of the former USTs and one sample was collected southwest of the former USTs. The surface water flow <br /> direction was not evident at the time of sampling but it is assumed that Five Mile Creek flows from north <br /> to south. Petroleum hydrocarbons were not detected in surface water samples collected from adjacent <br /> Five Mile Creek. <br /> On January 26, 2022 ATC Group Services LLC dba Atlas Technical submitted to the RWQCB the Semi- <br /> Annual Groundwater Monitoring and Remediation Status Report Fourth Quarter 2021 and Low Treat <br /> Closure Evaluation. This report concluded that the site generally meets the "Class 5" definition of the <br /> policy. <br /> On March 14, 2022, the RWQCB issued a request for public participation in anticipation of site closure. <br /> The public comment period yielded no comments. <br /> On July 15, 2022,the RWQCB sent a directive letter to begin well destruction activities as part of the case <br /> closure process and in accordance with San Joaquin County Environmental Health Department's well <br /> destruction requirements. <br /> Well construction details for all current and former site wells are summarized in Table 1 and well locations <br /> are shown on Figure 2. <br /> SCOPE OF WORK <br /> Well Destruction Activities <br /> Site Health and Safety Plan <br /> As required by the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) Standard "Hazardous Waste <br /> Operation and Emergency Response"guidelines(29 CFR 1910.120), and by California Occupational Safety <br /> and Health Administration (Cal-OSHA) "Hazardous Waste Operations and Emergency Response" <br /> guidelines(CCR Title 8,Section 5192),Atlas will prepare a Site-Specific Health and Safety Plan (HASP) prior <br />