Laserfiche WebLink
HL <br />ffROUP INC. <br />John W. Johnson <br />Co -President <br />Architect <br />Brian E Zita <br />Co -President <br />Architect <br />John B. Hicks <br />Vice President <br />Regional Managers <br />Brad A. Gubser <br />ARCH ITECTU RE • E N G I N E E R I N G <br />3001 Douglas Boulevard, Suite 210, Roseville, CA 95661 <br />June 15, 2006 <br />• E N V I R O N M E N T A L S E R V I C E S <br />Telephone: (916) 771-2555 Facsimile: (916) 771-9255 <br />Lori Luces, REHS <br />San Joaquin County Environmental Health Department <br />304 East Weber Avenue <br />Stockton, Ca 95202 <br />RE: Jack in the Box <br />10858 Trinity Parkway <br />Stockton, Ca <br />2005 JUL -6 AM 9= 56 <br />SAN 10AU:;iN 000TNrY <br />EN;YIf,'0?4ME1iTAL <br />HEo1LTN CEPt R TMENT <br />Dear Lori: <br />This letter is in response to your Deficiencies/Discrepancies letter dated June 9, 2006, for the <br />underground tank and piping system proposed at the above location. <br />Jesse E. Macias Comment #1: Attached to this letter is a copy of proper permit page with the correct contact and <br />Roy W. Pedro billing information and the proper signatures. <br />Alan K. Shimabukuro <br />John W. Strobel Comment #2 Attached to this letter is documentation provided by Advanced Containment <br />(DiMaggio Maintenance) stating that the double wall containment sumps and double <br />wall under dispenser containment sumps are third party tested and approved. <br />Comment #3 The required documentation is attached to this letter. <br />Comment #4 The required documentation is attached to this letter. <br />Comment #5 The required documentation is attached to this letter. <br />Comment #6 Attached to this letter are three copies of buoyancy calculations for both of the <br />underground fuel tanks being installed. These buoyancy calculations have been wet <br />stamped and signed by a California licensed engineer. <br />Comment #7 Both the underground tank annular spaces and all containment sump annular spaces <br />ROSEVILLE, CA Comment #10 To meet the requirements of constant monitoring of annular spaces, two different <br />SCOTTSDALE, AZ types are proposed for use. The annular spaces for the underground tanks, fill <br />containment sump, turbine pump containment sump, all under -dispenser <br />containment sumps, and vent transition sump will be hydrostatically monitored. The <br />annular spaces for the underground product, vent and Phase H vapor return will be <br />vacuum monitored. <br />www.rhk"gn.com <br />will be monitored by single float liquid level sensors. <br />Offices <br />Comment #8 Detail 7, Sheet F3.0 has been revised to show a 1/4" diameter nylon tube running <br />ANAHEIM, CA <br />from the submersible pump siphon cartridge (source of vacuum) to the input tee of <br />BELLEVUE, WA <br />each Vac Sensor System. <br />CAMAS, WA <br />Comment #9 Per our conversation on June 9th, I understand that you are talking about the Phase <br />DENVER, CO <br />H vapor return manifold piping. California Air Resources Board requires vapors to <br />MARTINEZ, CA <br />return to both gasoline product tanks hence the need for vapor return piping in both <br />the 87 and 91 octane fill sumps. <br />PETALUMA, CA <br />ROSEVILLE, CA Comment #10 To meet the requirements of constant monitoring of annular spaces, two different <br />SCOTTSDALE, AZ types are proposed for use. The annular spaces for the underground tanks, fill <br />containment sump, turbine pump containment sump, all under -dispenser <br />containment sumps, and vent transition sump will be hydrostatically monitored. The <br />annular spaces for the underground product, vent and Phase H vapor return will be <br />vacuum monitored. <br />www.rhk"gn.com <br />