Laserfiche WebLink
i <br /> 'I <br /> lli 1. Technical Criteria <br /> 2 2 . Remedial Action Alternatives Developed <br /> 3 3 . Environmental and Public Health Criteria <br /> 4 4 . Other Screening Criteria <br /> 51 5 . Cost Criteria <br /> I <br /> 6 d. Analysis of Remedial Action Alternatives <br /> 7 1. Technical Feasibility <br /> 8 2 . Environmental Evaluation <br /> 9I 3 . Institutional Requirements <br /> 101 4 . Public Health Evaluation <br /> I � <br /> 11I 5 . Cost Analysis <br /> 121 e. Recommended Remedial Action. The Department shall review the <br /> 13 i Feasibility Study Report for the Site and either approve it as <br /> 141submittedor provide comments in writing to PG&E on how it must be <br /> 15 changed. <br /> 16 3 . 2 . Public Participation Plan. Within 90 days of the effective ) <br /> 171 date of this Order, PG&E shall prepare and submit for Department <br /> 18 . review and approval a Public Participation Plan and Schedule which <br /> i <br /> 19 describes how the public and the adjoining community will be kept <br /> 201 informed of activities conducted at the Sites and how responses will <br /> 211 be made to inquiries from concerned citizens. The plan must be <br /> 22 submitted in the Public Participation Plan format and must be <br /> 23ideveloped in accordance with the following guidance: (a) EPA' s <br /> 24 , guidance document "Community Relations in Superfund: A Handbook" <br /> i <br /> 251 (Draft, October, 1987) , or any applicable revision thereof; (b) The <br /> 26 ; Department' s Public Participation Policy and Guidance Manual, or any <br /> 271 <br /> applicable revision thereof ; and (c) applicable portions of Health <br /> -4P`ER 21 <br /> CALIFORNIA <br /> ,REV. 8.721 j <br /> �I <br />