Laserfiche WebLink
heavy metal-contaminated fugitive dusts or if potable or nonpotable (i.e. , <br /> watering livestock or crops) uses of water from domestic wells near the site <br /> that were not sampled are resulting in human exposure. If it is determined <br /> that appreciable concentrations of fugitive dusts have been or are being <br /> transported via air, appropriate off-site surface soil and ambient air <br /> monitoring -- that considers the potential for heavy metal exposure to <br /> sensitive subpopulations (i.e. , children) -- are needed. <br /> PUBLIC HEALTH IMPLICATIONS <br /> No discussion of the public health implications of possible non-worker <br /> exposure to site-related contaminants can be offered at this time because of <br /> the lack of complete data and information related to the human exposure <br /> pathways. Current data and information related to exposure to contaminated <br /> groundwater indicate that humans are not being exposed to contaminants at <br /> concentrations above health-based levels; however, as indicated previously, <br /> there are insufficient data and information to completely eliminate the <br /> possibility of significant human exposure to groundwater contaminants. <br /> Kearney workers may have been exposed in the past to groundwater contaminants <br /> through ingestion of drinking water from plant drinking-water fountains and <br /> from inhalation of volatilized VOCs from water used in the manufacturing <br /> process. Based on monitoring data from 1986, several VOCs were found in <br /> production well water at concentrations above levels of long-term health <br /> concern. However, it cannot be determined with available information the <br /> length of exposure and the amount of contaminated water that individual <br /> workers may have consumed. In addition, on-site workers may be, or may have <br /> been exposed to heavy metal-contaminated fugitive dusts which may be, or may <br /> have been, present in ambient air. Additional ambient air and surface soil <br /> monitoring data, however, are needed to evaluate such potential human exposure <br /> before discussing the potential health effects. During conversations with <br /> Robert Schlag, California Department of Health Service, it was determined that <br /> because of the possible past and present worker exposure at the Kearney-KPF <br /> site, this site should be referred to the California Occupational Safety and <br /> Health Administration for followup (personal communication, September 24, <br /> 1990) . <br /> CONCLUSIONS <br /> 1. The Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry considers this site <br /> an indeterminate public health hazard because the limited data do not <br /> indicate that humans are being or have been exposed to levels of <br /> contamination that would be expected to cause adverse health effects. <br /> However, data or information are not available for all environmental media <br /> to which humans may be, or may have been, exposed. <br /> 2. Kearney-KPF workers may have been exposed in the past to groundwater <br /> contaminants through ingestion of drinking water from plant drinking- <br /> water fountains and from inhalation of volatilized VOCs from water used in <br /> the manufacturing process; therefore, this site is being referred to the <br /> 10 <br />