My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
COMPLIANCE INFO 2006 - 2007
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
K
>
KETTLEMAN
>
800
>
2300 - Underground Storage Tank Program
>
PR0231349
>
COMPLIANCE INFO 2006 - 2007
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/21/2021 4:57:32 PM
Creation date
11/5/2018 3:55:32 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2300 - Underground Storage Tank Program
File Section
COMPLIANCE INFO
FileName_PostFix
2006 - 2007
RECORD_ID
PR0231349
PE
2351
FACILITY_ID
FA0003633
FACILITY_NAME
ARCO 07049
STREET_NUMBER
800
Direction
E
STREET_NAME
KETTLEMAN
STREET_TYPE
Ln
City
Lodi
Zip
95240
APN
06206042
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
800 E Kettleman Ln
P_LOCATION
02
P_DISTRICT
004
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\kblackwell
Supplemental fields
FilePath
\MIGRATIONS\K\KETTLEMAN\800\PR0231349\COMPLIANCE INFO 2006 - 2007.PDF
QuestysFileName
COMPLIANCE INFO 2006 - 2007
QuestysRecordDate
2/16/2018 6:39:17 PM
QuestysRecordID
3798594
QuestysRecordType
12
QuestysStateID
1
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
123
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Mooring System Certification <br /> Site Address: 800 KETTLEMAN LN Date of Testing/Service: 05/02/2007 <br /> PTO N-85 <br /> D. Results of Testing/Servicing <br /> Software Version Installed: 123.02 <br /> omplete the following checklist: <br /> Yes ❑No* Is the audible alarm operational? <br /> Yes ❑No' Is the visual alarm operational? <br /> Yes ❑NoWere all sensors visually inspected,functionally tested, and confirmed operational? <br /> Were all sensors installed at lowest point of secondary containment and positioned so that other equipment will not <br /> Yes ❑No' <br /> interfere with their proper operation? <br /> Yes ❑No* X N/A If alarms are relayed to a remote monitoring station, is all communications equipment(e.g.modem)operational? <br /> For pressurized piping systems,does the turbine automatically shut down if the piping secondary containment <br /> RI Yes ❑No* ❑N/A monitoring system detects a leak,fails to operate,or is electrically disconnected?If yes:which sensors initiate positive <br /> shut-down?(check all that apply) ❑x Sump/Trench Sensors; ❑X Dispenser Containment Sensors. <br /> Did you confirm positive shut-down due to leaks Sild sensor failure/disconnection? ❑X Yes ❑ No <br /> Yes ❑No' ❑N/A For tank systems that utilize the monitoring system as the primary tank overfill warning device(i.e.:no mechanical <br /> overfill prevention valve is installed),is the overfill warning alarm visible and audible at the tank fill points(s)and operating <br /> properly? If so,at what percent of tank capacity does the alarm trigger? 90 <br /> Yes- X❑No Was any monitoring equipment replaced?If yes, identify specific sensors,probes,or other equipment replaced and list the <br /> manufacturer name and model for all replacement parts in Section E,below. <br /> -1 Yes* ❑X No Was liquid found inside any secondary containment systems designed as dry systems?(check all that apply) ❑Product; <br /> ❑ Water. If yes,describe causes in Section E,below. <br /> Yes ❑No• Was monitoring system set-up reviewed to ensure proper settings?Attach set-up reports, if applicable. <br /> RI Yes ❑No* Is all monitoring equipment operational per manufacturers'specifications? <br /> *In Section E below,describe how and when these deficiences were or will be corrected. <br /> E. Comments: <br /> Page 2 of 3 Based on CA form dated 03/01 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.