My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
COMPLIANCE INFO 1987-2011
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
N
>
NEWTON
>
4051
>
2300 - Underground Storage Tank Program
>
PR0231868
>
COMPLIANCE INFO 1987-2011
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/30/2024 4:52:41 PM
Creation date
11/5/2018 10:43:38 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2300 - Underground Storage Tank Program
File Section
COMPLIANCE INFO
FileName_PostFix
1987-2011
RECORD_ID
PR0231868
PE
2361
FACILITY_ID
FA0004045
FACILITY_NAME
AT&T California - UER47
STREET_NUMBER
4051
STREET_NAME
NEWTON
STREET_TYPE
Rd
City
Stockton
Zip
95205
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
4051 Newton Rd
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
002
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\rtan
Supplemental fields
FilePath
\MIGRATIONS\IAError\N\NEWTON\4051\PR0231868\COMPLIANCE INFO 1987-2011 .PDF
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
205
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Site Address: 405] NEWTON ROAD, STOCKTON <br /> Date of Testing/Servicing: 8/9/02 <br /> F. In-Tank Gauging/SIR Equipment: ® Check this box if tank gauging is used only for inventory control. <br /> ❑ Check this box if no tank gauging or SIR equipment is installed. <br /> This section must be completed if in-tank gauging equipment is used to perform leak detection monitoring. <br /> Com tete the followin checklist: ix <br /> ® Yes ❑ No Has all input wiring been inspected for proper entry and termination, including testing for ground faults? <br /> ® Yes ❑ No* Were all tank gauging probes visually inspected for damage and residue buildup? <br /> ® Yes ❑ No* Was accuracy of system product level readings tested? <br /> ® Yes ❑ No* Was accuracy of system water level readings tested? <br /> ® Yes ❑ No* Were all probes reinstalled properly? <br /> ® the equipment manufacturer's maintenance checklist completed? <br /> Yes [I No* Were all items on <br /> * In the Section H,below,describe how and when these deficiencies were or will be corrected. <br /> G. Line Leak Detectors (LLD): I@ Check this box if LLDs are not installed. <br /> Com tete the foil 'OR checklist: <br /> ❑ Yes ❑ No* For equipment start-up or annual equipment certification, was a leak simulated to verify LLD performance? <br /> ❑ N/A (Check all that apply) Simulated leak rate: ❑ 3 g.p.h.'; ❑ 0.1 g.p.h.Z; ❑ 0.2 g.p.h 2 <br /> Notes: 1. Required for equipment start-up certification and annual certification. <br /> 2. Unless mandated by local agency,certification required only for electronic LLD start-up. <br /> ❑ Yes ❑ No* Were all LLDs confirmed operational and accurate within regulatory requirements? <br /> ❑ Yes ❑ No* Was the testing apparatus properly calibrated? <br /> ❑ Yes ❑ No* For mechanical LLDs,does the LLD restrict product flow if it detects a leak? <br /> ❑ N/A <br /> ❑ Yes ❑ No* For electronic LLDs,does the turbine automatically shut off if the LLD detects a leak? <br /> ❑ N/A <br /> ❑ Yes ❑ No* For electronic LLDs, does the turbine automatically shut off if any portion of the monitoring system is disabled <br /> ❑ N/A or disconnected? <br /> ❑ Yes ❑ No* For electronic LLDs, does the turbine automatically shut off if any portion of the monitoring system <br /> ❑ N/A malfunctions or fails a test? <br /> ❑ Yes ❑ No* For electronic LLDs,have all accessible wiring connections been visually inspected? <br /> ❑ N/A <br /> ❑ Yes ❑ No* Were all items on the equipment manufacturer's maintenance checklist completed? <br /> * In the Section H,below,describe how and when these deficiencies were or will be corrected. <br /> H. Comments: <br /> Page 3 of 3 03/01 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.