Laserfiche WebLink
UST inspection report was sent under separate cover.) After inspecting the <br /> UST, we returned to Mr. Granneman's office near the production line. At this <br /> time we decided to begin the facility inspection and finish with a records <br /> inspection. <br /> First, we inspected the foam production, storage, and cutting areas and <br /> found no violations. We then proceeded to the maintenance shop in the <br /> middle of the complex where contaminated absorbent was held in an <br /> unlabeled, <br /> 30 gallon Safety Kleen drum. We informed Mr. Granneman that all hazardous <br /> waste containers must be properly labeled. <br /> We continued through the storage and foam recycling area to the hazardous <br /> waste storage area. As stated previously, two drums of N-Methyl pyrildinone <br /> were stored there awaiting chemical characterization, and disposal. <br /> Approximately 25-35 lead-acid batteries were also stored there. Mr. <br /> Granneman is looking for a battery recycler before having these batteries <br /> disposed of as hazardous waste. From there we went to the foam bailer <br /> where we noticed a hydraulic fluid leak. Absorbent is used to clean up the <br /> spillage, however, the absorbent drum was unlabeled. <br /> From there we walked to the truck repair shop in the north-east corner of the <br /> facility. One 30 gallon drum of Safety Kleen absorbent was unlabeled, and 3 <br /> waste oil drums did not have accurate accumulation start dates. Mr. <br /> Granneman stated he would relabel the drums correctly following the waste <br /> oil pick-ups. East of this shop is a 2,000 gallon aboveground storage tank <br /> that is not being used. Empty drums are also stored at this location. <br /> Back inside the main facility, near the north wall, one 55 gallon drum of <br /> waste glue containing 1,1,1-Trichloroethane was unlabeled. <br /> Upon completion of the facility inspection, we returned to Mr. Granneman's <br /> office to review the records which included: hazardous waste manifests, the <br /> contingency plan, employee training records, and the spill response log. All <br /> of these records were neat and very well organized. One violation was <br /> noted regarding the contingency plan (see violations section). <br /> IX. DISCUSSION WITH MANAGEMENT: <br /> Upon completion of the site and records inspection, we discussed the noted <br /> violations with Mr. Granneman. We informed him that a copy of the report of <br /> violations and the schedule for correction would be mailed to him upon <br /> completion. <br /> c: Alan Ito, CAL EPA, Department of Toxic Substances Control <br /> 5 <br />