My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS PHASE II ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT REPORT
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
M
>
MAIN
>
1025
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0527594
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS PHASE II ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT REPORT
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/7/2018 9:11:21 AM
Creation date
12/7/2018 9:01:45 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS
FileName_PostFix
PHASE II ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT REPORT
RECORD_ID
PR0527594
PE
2950
FACILITY_ID
FA0018697
FACILITY_NAME
VICTOR ROSASCO
STREET_NUMBER
1025
Direction
E
STREET_NAME
MAIN
STREET_TYPE
ST
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95205
APN
15120103
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
1025 E MAIN ST
P_LOCATION
01
P_DISTRICT
001
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
TMorelli
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
85
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
]r Phase D Environmental Site Assessment Report-Executive Summary <br /> 1025 East Main Street,Stockton,San Joaquin County,Califomia <br /> Page 2 <br /> An assumed easterly groundwater gradient direction was utilized when assessing the potential risk posed <br /> to the Site from off-site locations. This assumed groundwater gradient is based upon groundwater <br /> monitoring reports for nearby properties. Groundwater gradients in this area have fluctuated significantly <br /> over time, and current gradient directions may not represent historic gradients. Anticipated depth of <br /> groundwater was approximately 40 feet below ground surface(bgs). <br /> 6. <br /> The Phase I ESA identified three Recognized Environmental Conditions (RECs): <br /> L1. The historic rail use of the Site -Soil in the immediate area of former railroads and spur lines may <br /> be impacted by metals and petroleum hydrocarbons. <br /> L2. The construction of the train depot structure prior to the 1970s - Painted wood structures pre- <br /> dating the 1970s were likely to be painted with lead-based paint. Asbestos-containing building <br /> materials may be present in the WPRR depot. Organochlorine pesticides (OCPs) may have been <br /> applied around the depot for termite control. OCPs are a class of pesticides that were banned for use <br /> in the United States in the 1970s and 1980s due to toxicity and threat to human health and the <br /> environment. <br /> ` 3. Multiple off-site properties with identified or suspected groundwater contamination-Groundwater <br /> beneath the Site may be impacted by petroleum hydrocarbons and/or chlorinated solvents. <br /> L3.0 SAMPLING PROCEDURES AND RATIONALE <br /> L 3.1 SITE PREPARATION <br /> Condor completed boring permit applications and obtained the required permits prior to initiating field <br /> work. The proposed boring locations were marked with white paint and underground services alert <br /> L (USA) was notified one week in advance to identify utilities in and near the work area. Condor <br /> coordinated all work with the SJCEHD, the property owner, and subcontractors. Prior to commencement <br /> of fieldwork, a tailgate safety meeting was held and the site-specific Health and Safety Plan was <br /> j discussed with and presented to all field personnel. <br /> L 3.2 SOIL SAMPLING <br /> L Surface soil samples were collected by removing surface debris; loosening the soil with a stainless steel <br /> shovel, and transferring the soil into 9-ounce (oz.) laboratory-supplied glass jars. Subsurface samples <br /> were transferred either into a 9 oz. laboratory-supplied glass jar or collected in brass tubes using a <br /> slide-hammer. The samples collected in brass tubes were capped and sealed with Teflon tape and end caps. <br /> L Each sample container was labeled for sample identification and placed in a cooler chilled with ice. The <br /> sampling equipment was decontaminated by washing with a solution of laboratory-grade, non-phosphate <br /> s detergent and double-rinsed with distilled water prior to use at each sample location. <br /> L <br /> L <br /> V <br /> n <br /> i �� CONDO <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.