Laserfiche WebLink
Ge0"' ical?ecaics 4nc. <br /> Rehrig Pacific Inc. Page 3 <br /> ' Phase II ESA Report <br /> Project No.: 709.2 <br /> January 4, 1999 <br /> Paint (Ink) Shed <br /> 1. A hole was cored through the concrete of the truck ramp where the paint shed had <br /> ' previously been located. <br /> 2. One borehole (GP-3/HB-1) was drilled by a direct push GeoProbe rig to the capillary <br /> fringe. <br /> 3. The borehole was logged for the geologic properties, discoloration and any unnatural <br /> odor as observed in the drill cuttings that are removed during the drilling process. <br /> 4. Soil samples were collected at 3 and 6 feet bgs. <br /> 5. A hydropunch type groundwater sampling tool was advanced into the groundwater and a <br /> ' water sample was collected. <br /> 6. The borehole was grouted up with neat cement grout under the supervision of Lori <br /> Duncan of SJC PHS/EHD. <br /> 7. Two soil samples were submitted to Sherwood labs and tested for TEPH-D, MO by EPA <br /> method 8015m and Halogenated Solvents by EPA method 8010. <br /> 8. The groundwater sample was submitted to Sherwood labs and tested for BTEX by EPA <br /> ' method 602 and Halogenated Solvents by EPA method 601. <br /> Trash Compactor <br /> 1. Two boreholes (HB-6 & HB-7) were drilled through the area of heaviest staining by hand <br /> ' auger methods to 7.5 feet bgs. <br /> 2. The boreholes were logged for the geologic properties, discoloration and any unnatural <br /> odor as observed in the drill cuttings that are removed during the drilling process. <br /> ' 3. Soil samples were collected at 3.5 and 7.5 feet bgs in HB-6 and at 1, 3 and 7.5 feet bgs in <br /> HB-7. <br /> 4. The boreholes were grouted up with neat cement grout under the supervision of Lori <br /> ' Duncan of SJC PHS/EHD. <br /> 5. Two soil samples from HB-6 and three soil samples from HB-7 were submitted to <br /> Sherwood labs and tested for TEPH-D, MO by EPA method 8015m and Halogenated <br /> Solvents by EPA method 8010. <br /> tStorage/Machinery Cleaning Area <br /> 1. Two boreholes (GP-1 & GP-2) were drilled by a direct push GeoProbe rig to the capillary <br /> ' fringe. <br /> 2. The boreholes were logged for the geologic properties, discoloration and any unnatural <br /> odor as observed in the drill cuttings that are removed during the drilling pro_cess. <br /> ' <br /> 3. Soil samples were collected at 10 feet bgs in GP-1 and 6.5 feet bgs in GP-2.4. A hydropunch type groundwater sampling tool was advanced into the groundwater and <br /> water samples were collected from each borehole. <br /> 5. The boreholes were grouted up with neat cement grout under the supervision of Lori <br /> ' Duncan of SJC PHS/EHD. <br /> 6. One soil sample from each borehole was submitted to Sherwood labs and tested for <br /> TEPH-D, MO by EPA method 8015m and Halogenated Solvents by EPA method 8010. <br /> ' 7. The groundwater samples were submitted to Sherwood labs and tested for BTEX by EPA <br /> method 602, TEPH-D, MO by EPA method 3510/8015m and Halogenated Solvents by <br /> EPA method 601. <br /> Soil Beneath Northern Warehouse <br /> 1. On December 21, 1998 two additional soil borings (SB-1 & SB-2) were drilled for the <br /> purpose of collecting geotechnical data for the future modification of the warehouse <br /> ' foundation. These boreholes were drilled through the floor in the southeast area of the <br /> warehouse. <br />