My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FIELD DOCUMENTS
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
B
>
BECKMAN
>
300
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0507767
>
FIELD DOCUMENTS
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/6/2019 10:58:09 AM
Creation date
2/6/2019 10:51:16 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
FIELD DOCUMENTS
RECORD_ID
PR0507767
PE
2950
FACILITY_ID
FA0007750
FACILITY_NAME
CERTAINTEED
STREET_NUMBER
300
Direction
S
STREET_NAME
BECKMAN
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
LODI
Zip
952403103
APN
04931006
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
300 S BECKMAN RD
P_LOCATION
02
P_DISTRICT
004
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
WNg
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
74
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
2.6.2 Previously Removed Underground Storage Tank(UST) <br /> The Environ Phase I and records obtained from the San Joaquin County <br /> Environmental <br /> Health Department indicated a 500 gallon gasoline UST was present at the Subject <br /> Property. The report indicated that the tank was removed from the ground in 1988. <br /> Based on review of the tank removal report and interviews with onsite personnel the <br /> location of the former UST is unknown and potential locations were covered with <br /> new construction which prohibited the installation of soil borings in those areas. <br /> No other issues were noted during Sage's research of the site information that would <br /> require further investigation. The sampling strategy Sage has included to address the <br /> Other Findings and De Minimis conditions identified would also identify other <br /> potential releases not identified in the Phase I report or other research. <br /> 2.7 Soil Sampling Procedures <br /> Sampling locations were selected based on historical site information and experience with <br /> similar properties. Soil sampling was performed using industry accepted methods and <br /> methodologies in the EPA Field Branches Quality Systems and Technical Procedures(EPA, <br /> 2008). Prior to initiation soil sampling activities, Sage contacted the Underground Service <br /> Alert(USA)to obtain clearance prior to subsurface drilling activities. <br /> Soil borings were performed using direct-push sampling techniques. The direct-push <br /> sampling technique utilizes a hydraulic system and percussion hammer to advance a 2.25- <br /> inch diameter sampling apparatus. Soil samples were collected continuously in 4-foot <br /> intervals as the borings were advanced. The samples were collected using an apparatus lined <br /> with a butylene tube that is pressed onto a properly decontaminated cutting shoe. This <br /> technique allows for rapid site assessment while also minimizing soil cuttings generated by <br /> the sampling operations. Before beginning soil boring activities and between soil sampling <br /> locations, all downhole sampling equipment was decontaminated in accordance with EPA <br /> guidelines to minimize the potential for cross- contamination between samples. Boring logs <br /> were prepared for each location and are located in the Appendix C. <br /> One Soil sample was collected using a hand auger from approximately 1.0 to 1.5 feet below <br /> ground surface in the vacant field located in the western portion of the Subject Property. <br /> Two sump samples were collected from approximately 8 feet below ground surface. The <br /> samples were collected using a clean scoop connected to an extension pole. <br /> 2.8 Sample Handling and Testing <br /> The samples were placed in appropriate containers, preserved in a cooler of ice at <br /> approximately <br /> 4°C,and delivered to Alpha Analytical Inc.,located in Rancho Cordova,California.Proper <br /> chain-of- custody procedures were followed throughout sample collection and handling. <br /> Sage Environmental Consulting,L.P. 2-3 Westlake Chemical Company <br /> July 2013 Lodi,CA,Phase II Investigation <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.