My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE FILE 2
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
C
>
CALIFORNIA
>
300
>
3500 - Local Oversight Program
>
PR0544147
>
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE FILE 2
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/14/2019 12:35:08 PM
Creation date
2/14/2019 11:52:40 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
3500 - Local Oversight Program
File Section
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
FileName_PostFix
FILE 2
RECORD_ID
PR0544147
PE
3526
FACILITY_ID
FA0004522
FACILITY_NAME
SKIPS SERVICE STATION
STREET_NUMBER
300
Direction
S
STREET_NAME
CALIFORNIA
STREET_TYPE
ST
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95206
APN
14909501
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
300 S CALIFORNIA ST
P_LOCATION
01
P_DISTRICT
001
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
WNg
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
160
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ii <br /> 2- TPHg and BTEX concentration jumps in EW-1 since tne GWE has been offsite <br /> (Feb 2009). Most recent TPHg concentrations in this well have more than <br /> doubled since 2009. (+100,000 ug/1) <br /> 3- CUF has allocated $50,000 for this site for this fiscal year. Way more than <br /> —90% of our sites were allocated. In addition, the CUFs most recent 5-year <br /> review wants us to "direct the RP to resume active remediation" and "additional <br /> remediation is necessary to further reduce hydrocarbon mass and achieve <br /> WQOs in a timely manner". <br /> I have discussed the site with Nuel and we agreed that I will be generating a <br /> comment letter addressing all three concerns noted above. A deadline will be <br /> issued to resume active remediation. Most likely 30 days. <br /> I suggest you make plans to do whatever is necessary to re-start and continue <br /> the CAP and keep the site in compliance. <br /> mike <br /> From: Mike Infurna [EH] <br /> Sent: Tuesday, November 15, 20118:22 AM <br /> To: 'Michael Vlach' <br /> Subject: RE: Olivarez <br /> Not yet, I'm swamped with NFARs and field work. I will review your SAMR as <br /> priorities allow. Until then, please continue with the currently approved plan for <br /> the site, <br /> You are always welcomed to submit a NFAR. The EHD will review and <br /> comment. Until a NFAR is submitted or a change to the current site status is <br /> approved, you are to continue with the most recently approved corrective action. <br /> You've been through this with Vogue Cleaners, There have been no changes <br /> since you requested NFA there. <br /> From: Michael Vlach [mailto:michaelvlach@comcast.net] <br /> Sent: Tuesday, November 15, 20117:22 AM <br /> To: Mike Infurna [EH] <br /> Subject: Olivarez <br /> Mike- In the 3rd quarter monitoring report, I recommended reviewing the trend lines to see if the site is <br /> a possible candidate for the current closure requirements, before issuing comments or approval of the <br /> bio-reactor. Have you had a chance to look at it? <br /> -Mike Vlach <br /> Foothill Engineering <br /> 1/27/2012 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.