COMPLIANCE INFO 2013 - 2018 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

NOV 14 2014 8. FILL RISER CONTAINMENT SUMP TESTING Facility is Not Equipped With Fill Riser Containment Sumps p _ _ "ALEH Fill Riser Containment Sumps are Present,but were Not Tested p =' Test Method Developed By: O Sump ManufaCttrrer industry Standardy p Professional E?ngineer i 0 Other(Specify) Test Method Used: 'T O Pressure `_._..__.._..—p`vacuum ® Hydrostatic O Other(Specify) .........._ rest Equipment Used: Incon Sump Tester Equipment Resolution: +/-0.002" Hill Sump#87 Fill Sump#91 Fill Sump#Diesel Sump Diameter; 42- 42" 42' Sump Depth: — 72" T— 72" i 72" Height from Tank Top to Top of 18" 18" 24" Highest Piping Penetration: I Height from Tank Top to Lowest �1" 21" 22„ Electrical Penetration: 1 Condition of sump prior to Good Good _ Good testing: Portion of Sump Tested 2"above piping 2"above pipima 2"above PiRing Sump Material: Fiberglass Fiberglass Fiberglass Wait time between applying pressurelvacuum/water and 30 minutes 30 minutes 30 minutes starting test: Test Start Time: 8:39 am 9:03 am 8:39 am Initial Reading(Rr): 4.7260 7.1443 4.0033 Test End Time: 8:54 am _ 9:18 am 8:54 am Final Reading(R.r): 4,7259 7.1442 4.0029 _ Test Duration: 15 min. 15 min. 15 min. Change in Reading(Rr-Rj): 0.0001 0.0001 0.0004 Pass/Fail Threshold or Criteria: +/-0.002" +/-0.002" +/-0.002" Test Result: i I@ Pass 0 Fail 21 Pass 0 Fail I@ Pass ❑Fail Is there a sensor in the sump? ®Yes p No ®Yes O No N Yes O No Does the sensor alarm when either product or water is © Yes❑No N NA O Yes p No®NA [I Yes p No N NA detected? Was sensor removed for testing? N Yes[]No❑NA N Yes p No[3 NA N Yes O No❑NA Was sensor properly replaced and NYes p No p NA ®Yes O No O NA ®Yes O No p NA verified functional after testing? Comments—(include informalion on repairs made prior to leslinm and reconvnended,ffyllvir-up for firiled tests) _ Sensor functionality was not confirmed.This procedure is not part of the Secondary Containment testing scope of work