Laserfiche WebLink
r <br /> bottom tube was promptly preserved by covering the ends with <br /> teflon tape & plastic caps, and thoroughly sealing with duct <br /> tape . The tube was labeled, placed in a ziplok bag, and placed <br /> on ice pending transport to Sherwood labs for analysis . A water <br /> sampling tool was pushed into the satuated zone approximately 1 <br /> 1/21 and the screen was extended to allow collection of a water <br /> sample . Entry was very slow, so the screen was left in the hole, <br /> and equipment was thoroughly decontaminated. <br /> The truck was moved to the location for SP-2 as shown on PLATE <br /> II . The soil probe was pushed to 261 bgl, taking soil samples at <br /> 51 intervals from 51 to 251 bgl as described above . A clean <br /> water sampling tool was then lowered into the hole and pushed to <br /> approximately 271 Water samples were obtained by use of a clean <br /> stainless steel baler, and placed in 2 VOA' s & a 1 liter bottle <br /> which had been provided by the laboratory They were labeled and <br /> stored on ice pending transport <br /> After cleaning equipment, the probe unit was mobilized on loca- <br /> tion SP-3, (see PLATE II, ) and soil samples were collected at 51 <br /> intervals from 51 bgl to 201 , they were preserved as described <br /> above . A water sampling tool was pushed to 221 and groundwater <br /> was retreived and placed in 2 VOA1s and a 1 liter bottle They <br /> r <br /> were labeled and preserved on ice <br /> After decontaminating equipment, the probe truck was moved to <br /> location SP-4, (see PLATE II for it ' s location, ) and soil samples <br /> were collected at 5 ' intervals from 51 bgl to 251 bgl using the <br /> sample field procedures described earlier. Tools were then <br /> pushed to 30 1/21 , where water samples were collected as <br /> described above . <br /> After completing the above work, a clean bailer was lowered into <br /> the screen left in SP-1 to see if there was sufficient water <br /> entry for collecting samples . Entry was slow, and with the <br /> approval of Linda Turkatte of the San Joaquin County EHD, the <br /> hole was left open with the pipe & screen, (top covered, ) until <br /> the following day Soil probe locations SP-2, SP-3 , & SP-4 were <br /> grouted from total depth to the surface with cement, and opera- <br /> tions were suspended. <br /> There were no product odors detected in any of the soil or water <br /> samples . Refer to PLATES III, IV, V, & VI for soil sample <br /> descriptions . The preserved soil & water samples were trans- <br /> ferred to an employee of Sherwood Labs and transported to that <br /> facility under chain of custody; instructions were given to test <br /> for BTEX w/MTBE distinction, TPHg, and TEPH <br /> Operations began again on April 12 under the supervision of <br /> Charles Fry, RG; a bailer was lowered into SP-1, and sufficient <br /> 2 <br />