Laserfiche WebLink
Daby Humbert -2 - 16 April 2013 <br /> Zacky & Sons Poultry, LLC <br /> • Because the wastewater pond has been in use since 1973 and the liner is reportedly <br /> nearly 20 years old, continued use of the pond has the potential to degrade groundwater <br /> quality. Specifications of the existing pond liner and/or documentation of pond liner <br /> testing results are required as part of the RWD to demonstrate liner integrity. <br /> • Baseline groundwater information is necessary to characterize current groundwater <br /> conditions. We understand that the facility is located within an industrial area where <br /> groundwater degradation may have occurred from other off-site sources, and these <br /> factors are always a consideration in any groundwater assessment. General <br /> requirements for groundwater assessment activities are included as an attachment to <br /> this letter. <br /> • The April 2008 Baseline Groundwater Study Workplan proposes the installation and <br /> sampling of three shallow groundwater monitoring wells to determine the baseline <br /> groundwater quality and site gradient around the on-site aeration pond. The workplan <br /> addresses the comments in our 22 August 2007 letter, and is hereby approved. Table 1 <br /> of the attached checklist provides a list of required parameters for groundwater analysis <br /> to provide a profile of groundwater conditions. Results of two quarterly groundwater <br /> monitoring events, including a Monitoring Well Installation Report that contains well <br /> installation and construction details, must be included as part of the RWD. The <br /> installation of all monitoring wells shall conform to permitting requirements of the San <br /> Joaquin County Environmental Health Department. <br /> • Please be advised that the proposed monitoring well network may be sufficient for <br /> conducting a baseline groundwater assessment, but additional wells may be needed to <br /> better characterize groundwater conditions once groundwater conditions and gradient <br /> direction are confirmed. If so, the WDRs may include a requirement for the submittal of <br /> a workplan for additional groundwater monitoring wells. <br /> • State Water Resources Control Board Resolution 68-16 ("Policy with Respect to <br /> Maintaining High Quality Waters of the State") (hereafter Resolution 68-16) prohibits <br /> degradation of high-quality groundwater unless it has been shown that: <br /> a. The degradation is consistent with the maximum benefit to the people of the state. <br /> b. The degradation will not unreasonably affect present and anticipated future <br /> beneficial uses. <br /> c. The degradation does not result in water quality less than that prescribed in state <br /> and regional policies, including violation of one or more water quality objectives, and <br /> d. The discharger employs best practicable treatment or control (BPTC) to minimize <br /> degradation. <br /> The threat and complexity of this facility is profiled as 2B, as defined by the nature of facility <br /> operations and potential impact to groundwater. The 2008 RWD was submitted with a filing fee <br /> for the preparation of WDRs for the facility. Because review of the RWD has been delayed, <br /> you are not required to submit an additional filing fee. However, there are annual permit fees for <br /> WDRs once they are adopted. <br />