COMPLIANCE INFO 2010 - 2012 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

FEB-25-2011 15 38 Service Station Systems 408 938 8888 P.08 8 . FILL RISER CONTAINMENT SUMP TESTING Facility is Not Equipped With Fill Riser Containment Sumps ❑ Fill Riser Containment Sumps are Present,but were Not Tested ❑ Test Method Developed By: ❑ Sump Manufacturer 0 Industry Standard ❑ Professional Engineer ❑Other(Specify) Test Method Used: ❑Pressure ❑Vacuum ® Hydrostatic ❑ Other(Specify) Test Equipment Used: [neon Sump Tester Equipment Resolution: +/-0,002" -ME' Fill Sump 0 87 , Fill Sum, i#89 Fill Sump t#91 "'� Sum Diameter: 42" 42" 42" Sump Depth: 63_-.�. _ 63" 63" Height from Tank Top to Top of N/A N/A N/A Highest Piping Penetration: Height from Tank Top to Lowest 191, 19" 19" Electrical Penetration: Condition of sump prior to Good Good Good testing: I Portion of Sum Tested 2"above i inti- 2"above piping 2"above piping Sump Material: Fiber lass Fiberglass Fibers Wait time between applying pressure/vacuum/water and 30 minutes 30 minutes 30 minutes starting test: Test Start Time: 8:12 am 8:12 am _ 8:12 am _ Initial Reading(Ri): 3.5699 3.4310 3.0389 Test End Time: 8:27 am 8:27 am 8:27 am _ Final Reading(RF): 3.5701 j 3.4308 3.0387 Test Duration: 15 min. j 15 min, E IS min. Chane in Reading(R--R,): +0.0002 �r -0.0002 -0.0002 Pass/Fail Threshold or Criteria: j +/-0.002" +/-0.002" i _ +/-0.002" Test Result: ; 0 Pass 0 Fail 0 Pass ❑ FailLE Pass ❑ Fail Is there a sensor in the sump? ® Yes ❑No ® Yes ❑No ® Yes ❑No Does the sensor alarm when either product or water is ❑ Yes ❑No ®NA ❑Yes ❑No ®NA ❑ Yes ❑No ®NA detected? i Was sensor removed for testis? ®Yes ❑No [INA ®Yes ❑No ❑NA ® Yes ❑No ❑NA Was sensor properly replaced and ® Yes verified functional after testing? ❑No E]NA ® Yes []No ❑NA ❑ Yes [I No [INA Comments— (include infbrmalion on repairs made prior to lesting, and recommended follow-up for failed tests) "Sensor functionality was not confirmed. This procedure is not part of the Secondary Containment testing scope of work".