Laserfiche WebLink
Mr Nathan Crum - 2 - 23 May 2008 <br /> Valley Pacific Petroleum Services <br /> Wells MW-8 and MW-9R recently have contained SPH. Laboratory analysis of SPH samples <br /> obtained from these wells and from MW-6R was performed on 29 January 2008. The results <br /> showed that the SPH consisted primarily of weathered leaded gasoline and high sulfur diesel. <br /> Although some investigative activities have been conducted, the contamination plume has not <br /> been adequately delineated. Since 2000, Regional Water Board staff has attempted to work <br /> cooperatively with Valley Pacific to complete the investigative work and move forward with <br /> remediation. In a 28 November 2007 letter to you, Regional Water Board staff requested a <br /> Feasibility Study (FS) by 25 January 2008. When that due date expired, Regional Water <br /> Board staff sent a second request on 28 February with a due date of 7 March. Valley Pacific <br /> also failed to comply with that due date. <br /> During a 14 March site visit, Regional Water Board staff met with Valley Pacific and its <br /> environmental consultant, Ground Zero Analysis, Inc. (GZA), to discuss the Site and to reach <br /> agreement on how additional work at the Site was to proceed. At that time, Valley Pacific <br /> agreed to submit the FS no later than 7 April. On 7 May, Regional Water Board staff <br /> contacted Mr. Gregory Stahl of GZA by telephone because Regional Water Board staff had <br /> not received the FS. When asked, Mr. Stahl could not confirm whether an FS has been <br /> prepared. As of the date of this letter, Regional Water Board staff has not received the FS. <br /> Valley Pacific has not completed an evaluation of the feasibility of groundwater cleanup <br /> technologies, and no Site cleanup is occurring. In addition, the extent of the unauthorized <br /> discharge to groundwater beneath the site remains undefined to the east. These factors lead <br /> the Regional Water Board to the conclusion that this site continues to pose an unacceptably <br /> high threat to water resources. <br /> Pursuant to California Water Code section 13267, Valley Pacific is ordered to submit a Work <br /> Plan by 20 June 2008 that proposes a sufficient number of groundwater sampling locations to <br /> completely delineate the eastern extent of the plume and a time schedule for conducting the <br /> work. In addition, by 18 July 2008, Valley Pacific must submit a FS to select a remedy for <br /> separate, sorbed, and dissolved phase CDCs in soil and groundwater. The FS should be <br /> prepared in general accordance with the FS outline that Regional Water Board staff provided <br /> in our 25 July 2007 letter (copy attached). Additional investigation will be necessary to define <br /> the eastern extent of petroleum hydrocarbons in groundwater. Therefore, remedial systems <br /> proposed in the FS must have the capacity to be expanded to address the remainder of the <br /> plume, once it is defined. If necessary, additional lateral assessment may be implemented <br /> simultaneously with cleanup activities to evaluate the efficacy of remedial actions. The <br /> requested FS and Work Plan are technical reports. <br /> California Water Code section 13267 states, in part: <br /> "(b)(1) In conducting an investigation . . ., the regional board may require that any <br /> person who has discharged, discharges, or is suspected of having discharged or, <br /> discharging, or who proposes to discharge waste within its region . . . shall furnish, <br /> under penalty of perjury, technical or monitoring program reports which the regional <br /> board requires. The burden, including costs, of these reports shall bear a <br /> reasonable relationship to the need for the report and the benefits to be obtained <br /> from the reports. In requiring those reports, the regional board shall provide the <br /> person with a written explanation with regard to the need for the reports, and shall <br /> identify the evidence that supports requiring that person to provide the reports. <br /> As described in this letter, Valley Petroleum is subject to this Order pursuant to California <br /> Water Code section 13267 because Valley Petroleum is the current owner and operator of <br /> the fueling system that suffered an unauthorized release and therefore, Valley Petroleum is <br />