My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS XR0001676
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
C
>
CHEROKEE
>
16
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0522479
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS XR0001676
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/17/2019 3:05:08 PM
Creation date
5/17/2019 2:21:33 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS
FileName_PostFix
XR0001676
RECORD_ID
PR0522479
PE
2957
FACILITY_ID
FA0015299
FACILITY_NAME
GEWEKE LAND DEVELOPMENT & MARKETING
STREET_NUMBER
16
Direction
S
STREET_NAME
CHEROKEE
STREET_TYPE
LN
City
LODI
Zip
95240
APN
04323013
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
16 S CHEROKEE LN
P_DISTRICT
004
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\wng
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
126
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
20 January 2003 <br /> AGE-NC Project No 95-0109 <br /> Page 4 of 8 <br /> wells MW-15 through MW-19 were purged during well development(Section 2 1 4 )using a Watera <br /> Hydrollft Pump <br /> Between 6 and 7 gallons of water(a minimum of 3 casing-water volumes per well)were purged from <br /> wells MW-6 through MW-14 and approximately 80 gallons removed from EW-1,monitoring wells <br /> MW 15 through MW 19 were evacuated during development as described in section 2 1 4 <br /> Between 0 3 and 0 5 gallons of water were purged from wells MW-1 through MW-3 and MW-5 <br /> before the wells were purged dry, well MW-4 could not be purged at all and was dust sampled <br /> Temperature, pH and conductivity of the purge water were measured at regular purge-volume <br /> intervals using an Oakton water analyzer and the readings were recorded on field logs Field data and <br /> work sheets are included in Appendix B The purged water was contamenzed in 55-gallon <br /> DOT-approved drums and stored on-site <br /> 2 2 2 Collection and Analysis of Ground Water Samples <br /> The depth to water was re-measured after purging to ensure a minimum of 80 per cent recharge of <br /> the Initial water level in each well prior to sampling, wells MW-1 through MW-5 did not achieve <br /> the 80 per cent recharge after a 2- to 3-hour wait <br /> Afterwards, water samples were collected from each purged well using a new, disposable plastic <br /> bailer Immediately upon retrieval, the samples were transferred into 40-m1 EPA-approved VOA <br /> vials containing 0 5ml 18%hydrochloric acid as a sample preservative The samples were labeled, <br /> stored on ice, and transported in a chilled container, under chain-of-custody, to McCampbell <br /> Analytical, Inc (MAI), a State of California Department of Health Services-certified analytical <br /> laboratory The ground water samples were analyzed for <br /> • Total petroleum hydrocarbons quantified as gasoline (TPH-g) in accordance with EPA <br /> Methods 5030/8015M, <br /> • Benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene and xylenes (BTEX) in accordance with EPA method <br /> 8260B, <br /> • Fuel additives dl-Isopropyl ether(DIPE), ethyl tertiary-butyl ether(ETBE),methyl tertiary- <br /> butyl ether (MTBE), tertiary-amyl methyl ether (TAME), tertiary butanol (TBA), <br /> 1,2-dichloroethane (1,2-DCA) and ethylene dibromide (EDB) in accordance with EPA <br /> Method 8260B, and <br /> • Volatile organic compounds by full-scan EPA method 8260B <br /> Advanced GeoEnvironrnental,Inc <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.