My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
C
>
CHRISMAN
>
25700
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0508450
>
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/29/2019 11:58:23 AM
Creation date
5/29/2019 11:10:41 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
RECORD_ID
PR0508450
PE
2960
FACILITY_ID
FA0008087
FACILITY_NAME
DDJC-TRACY
STREET_NUMBER
25700
STREET_NAME
CHRISMAN
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
TRACY
Zip
95376
APN
25207002
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
25700 CHRISMAN RD
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
005
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\wng
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2212
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
DDRW is considering the construction of a percolation pond, which <br /> was mentioned at the public meeting for the OU-1 Proposed Plan <br /> held on January 14 , 1993 . DDRW said that it was also suggested <br /> by the State agencies . It is envisioned that the pond will be <br /> utilized to percolate and evaporate the treated water pumped from <br /> the aquifer. Mr. Robert Raspo, TRC member, asked why does DDRW <br /> require a pond? DDRW stated they plan to replace the water <br /> removed from the aquifer (e.g. , percolation and injection) . <br /> Attendees at the Proposed Plan public meeting suggested <br /> constructing the pond along with the State. DDRW said it would <br /> be cheaper than injection and maintenance would be less <br /> technical. The reinjection wells are subject to fouling. DDRW <br /> stated it would achieve the same results and it would be cheaper <br /> using percolation. The Regional Water Quality Control Board <br /> (RWQCB) stated facilities are required to look at alternative <br /> methods of disposal (e.g. , percolation, injection, alternate <br /> use, etc. ) . <br /> Ongoing Work⢠<br /> DDRW is currently monitoring TCE/PCE contaminated ground water at <br /> the Tracy Facility. The monitoring of OU-1 is being performed <br /> by Montgomery Watson. DDRW' s contractor, Montgomery-Watson, <br /> performs quarterly ground water sampling at the DDRW Tracy <br /> Facility and selected private residential wells . This <br /> information will be used during OU-1 design phase. <br /> Potential Source Areas : <br /> DDRW provided attendees with a map depicting the potential source <br /> areas of contamination. A risk assessment was performed which <br /> determined how much of a hazard via ground water pathway the <br /> PCE/TCE plumes pose to employees and the public. To make this <br /> determination they utilized geophysics, imaging technology, <br /> trenching, soil borings, and monitoring wells . This information <br /> along with new information gathered will be used to prepare a <br /> comprehensive risk assessment (all pathways : soil, water, air) <br /> for the Comprehensive Site Wide RI/FS . <br /> OU-1 Proposed Plan: <br /> The Proposed Plan reflects the preferred alternative selected by <br /> the lead and support agencies . DDRW selected air stripping as <br /> its method of cleanup. The air stripper will handle all volatile <br /> chemicals , not just TCE and PCE. It is speculated that it will <br /> take 30 years to clean up the ground water contamination at DDRW <br /> Tracy. <br /> 2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.