Laserfiche WebLink
Mr. James T. Davis -2- <br /> 3. In the active landfills, i.e. , pits 1 & 7, wastes are not <br /> covered within 24 hours of the time such hazardous wastes are <br /> placed therein as required in Section II,8, (b) , 12 of the and <br /> IX,1, (c) ISD and 40 CFR 304(d) . Radioactive wastes can be <br /> spread by wind outside these pits. Wildlife are also subject <br /> to contamination due to this lack of daily cover. <br /> 4. The groundwater monitoring requirements for the active haz- <br /> ardous waste landfills and surface impoundments have not been <br /> complied with as outlined in Section VII of the ISD and <br /> 40 CFR 265.91 and .92. The facility is in the process of <br /> assessing groundwater monitoring needs and has installed 2-3 wells <br /> downgradient and 1 well upgradient of each disposal pit. <br /> Implementation of an appropriate system, is planned for commpletion <br /> in May of 1983. The facility must implement groundwater monitor- <br /> ing as required by the Interim Status Document by May 30, 1983. <br /> 5. There are no closure or post closure plans for the disposal <br /> pits as required in Section V & VIII, 5 of the ISD and 40 CFR <br /> 265.112, 113, 115. <br /> 6. There is no estimate of closure and post closure costs as required <br /> in Section VI of the ISD, Department of Health Services/Hazardous <br /> Waste Management Branch's letter dated August 1, 1982 and 40 CFR <br /> 265.112, 142 and .144. <br /> 7. The Waste Analysis Plan does not specify adequate test methods, <br /> acceptable parameters or sampling methods as required in Section III, <br /> 3 of the ISD and 40 CFR 265.13. There is a Waste Analysis Plan <br /> dated February 12, 1982 but it does not clearly spell out these <br /> requirements. <br /> 8. Facility transports hazardous wastes to and from Lawrence Livermore <br /> National Laboratory in facility owned vehicles but is not registered <br /> as a Hazardous Waste Hauler with the Department of Health Services <br /> as required in Section 66420(a) of the California Administrative <br /> Code. <br /> 9. There was no written facility inspection schedule or inspection <br /> log as required in Section III, 5 of the ISD and 40 CFR 265.15(a) , <br /> (b) and (d) . <br /> 10. Wastewater from high explosive processing is clarified by settling <br /> out particles first in a gravity type separator, then passed through <br /> a compartmented settling tank and finally disposed of in surface <br /> impoundments. Facility has not analyzed wastes in settling tanks <br /> for heavy metals and organic degradation products nor analyzed for <br /> these substances plus radioactive wastes in the surface impoundment <br /> sediments to determine whether or not these hazardous wastes are <br /> present, as required in Sections I,4, (c) , III, 3of the ISD, 40 CFR <br /> 265.13 and Section 25200.5,(b) ,(1) of the California Health and <br /> Safety Code. <br />