Laserfiche WebLink
In-Situ Chemical Oxidation Feasibility Study Work Plan <br /> BOULEVARD AUTOMOTIVE SERVICE <br /> 2151 Country Club Boulevard, Stockton, California <br /> 1.0. INTRODUCTION <br /> Advanced GeoEnviron mental, Inc (AGE) has prepared this In-Situ Chemical Oxidation <br /> Feasibility Study Work Plan for the site located at 2151 Country Club Boulevard, Stockton, <br /> CA(site). The work plan evaluates in-situ chemical oxidation (ISCO) remedial alternatives <br /> to mitigate residual adsorbed and dissolved petroleum hydrocarbon impact to soil and <br /> ground water at the above-referenced site. Included in the work plan are procedures for <br /> the performance of a limited field scale pilot test. The site and surrounding area are <br /> illustrated in Figure 1. On-site structures,soil borings,well locations and other features are <br /> illustrated in Figure 2. Well construction details are summarized in Table 1. Ground water <br /> elevation and analytical data is provided in Table 2. Historical "grab" ground water <br /> analytical data is summarized in Table 3. Soil analytical data is summarized in Table 4. <br /> 2.0. SITE REMEDIAL FEASABILITY STUDY HISTORY <br /> Between 28 and 30 March 2011, a dual phase extraction (DPE) pilot test was conducted <br /> at the site. The DPE pilot test consisted of utilizing a portable, 25-horsepower, oil-filled, <br /> liquid ring pump to simultaneously extract ground water and soil-vapor from on-site well <br /> DPE-1 (screened 10 to 25 feet bsg). During the three day pilot testing period a total of <br /> 19,000 gallons of petroleum-impacted ground water was removed from extraction well as <br /> part of the pilot study. <br /> Based on field and analytical results, AGE concluded that the ground water portion of the <br /> dual-phase extraction process was (1) successful at drawing back significantly impacted <br /> ground water downgradient of the former UST area, (2) successful at inducing a large <br /> ground water radius of influence, and (3) was successful at capturing highly impacted <br /> waters/NAPL in the source area. However,AGE concluded that dual phase extraction was <br /> not successful at lowering the water table enough to expose the submerged screen <br /> intervals in the surrounding observation wells. <br /> Detailed results of the DPE pilot test were summarized in the AGE-prepared, Dual Phase <br /> Extraction Pilot Study Report- May 2011, dated 20 May 2011. <br /> 3.0. ISCO REMEDIAL ALTERNATIVES <br /> Due to DPE's inability to lower the water table and inability to expose intervals of <br /> significantly"drowned"adsorbed petroleum hydrocarbon impact,AGE has recommended <br /> Ad.need GeoEnvimnmenlal,Inc. <br />