Laserfiche WebLink
E C 0 R <br /> Additional Site Assessment and Site Conceptual Model <br /> 7-11 Store#14117 <br /> September 30, 2005 <br /> Page 6 <br /> complex The offsite borings did not contain detectable concentrations of petroleum <br /> hydrocarbons The onsite borings contained benzene, total petroleum hydrocarbons as <br /> gasoline (TPHg), and methyl-tert-butyl ether (MtBE) in soil at maximum concentrations of <br /> 12 5 milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg) (GP-17@20'), 42,900 mg/kg (GP-15@15'), and 234 <br /> mg/kg (GP-14@10'), respectively (Table 3) <br /> On May 13 and 14, 1999, four groundwater monitoring wells (MW-1 through MW-4) were <br /> Installed to 25 and 30 feet below ground surface (bgs) (Table 2) Benzene, TPHg, and <br /> MtBE in soil were reported at maximum concentrations of 2 89 mg/kg (MW-3-15'), 429 <br /> mg/kg (MW-3-15'), and 0 119 mg/kg (MW-4-20'), respectively (Table 3) <br /> On October 30, 2001, three groundwater monitoring wells (MW-5, MW-6, and MW-7) were <br /> installed to 20 feet bgs (Table 2) TPHg, benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, xylenes (BTEX), <br /> and MtBE in soil were not detected above laboratory reporting limits, except for 0 006 <br /> mg/kg total xylenes (MW-7@20') (Table 3) Selected halocarbons also present in the soil <br /> samples Indicated possible dry cleaner plume contributions (IT Corporation, 1999) <br /> On August 14, 2003, deep groundwater monitoring well (MW-8) and one soil boring (SB-1) <br /> were advanced onsite SECOR summarized this assessment In the February 27, 2004 <br /> Additional Site Assessment Report and Fate and Transport Model, which also presented <br /> calculations of the lateral migration of dissolved MtBE in groundwater <br /> Per the request of the SJCEHD, groundwater monitoring and sampling Is coordinated with a <br /> former Exxon site (currently a USA Gasoline station) Immediately east of the 7-Eleven site <br /> On July 22, 2004 , SECOR submitted a proposal for a Field Test Program for Evaluation of <br /> Oxidation Capacity of Groundwater to the RWQCB The RWQCB conditionally approved <br /> the proposal In a letter dated October 4, 2004 <br /> On July 27, 2004, SECOR submitted a Work Plan for Additional Offsite Assessment to the <br /> SJCEHD The work plan was approved by the SJCEHD in a letter dated August 23, 2004 <br /> The work plan proposed the installation of two offsite groundwater monitoring wells (MW-9 <br /> and MW-10), advancing three offsite soil borings (GP-1 through GP-3), two offsite CPT <br /> borings (CPT-2 and CPT-3) and one onsite CPT boring (CPT-1) <br /> 4 0 SOIL AND GROUNDWATER ASSESSMENT <br /> On April 26-28, 2005, SECOR supervised the advancement of two shallow geobrobe <br /> borings (GP-1 and GP-2), three deep Cone Penetration Test (CPT) borings (CPT-1, CPT-2 <br /> and CPT-3) and one oxygen injection well (1-1) (Figure 2 and Table 2) Data obtained from <br /> the installation of oxygen injection well 1-1 will be included In a separate report submitted to <br /> 117-Elevenl7-11 stares1141171Reports114117 SCM and Additional Assessment doe Page 6 <br />