Laserfiche WebLink
r p <br /> Fourth Quarter 2005,Quarterly Groundwater Monitoring Report <br /> Pilkington North America,Inc.,Lathrop,CA <br /> Page 3 of 5 <br /> Table 1 -Diesel Thickness Measurements and Product Recovery ffourth Quarter 2005)-Continued <br /> Depth Depth to Diesel Cumulative <br /> Recovery to Diesel <br /> Date Well ID Diesel Groundwater Thickness Removed Operations and Maintenance Notes <br /> feet (feet} (feet) (gallons) <br /> RW-1 - 14.38 - - <br /> RW-2 15.04 15.31 0.27 21.28 Initial product recovery tank volume approximately 4.6 gallons. <br /> RW-3 15.05 15.11 .06 22.34 Recovered approximately 1.6 gallons of product from RW-2, RW-3, <br /> 10/31/05 RW-4 and RW-6 using bailing recovery method. Reinstalled SoakEZ <br /> RW-4 14.26 15.57 0.31 100.91 socks in RW-2 and RW-6.Ending recovery tank volume approximately <br /> RW-5 - 14.20 - .2 gallons. <br /> RW-6 14.75 15.10 0.35 3.32 <br /> RW-1 - 14.34 - - <br /> RW-2 14.98 15.34 0.36 21.53 Initial product recovery tank volume approximately 6.2 gallons. <br /> RW-3 14.99 15.05 0.06 22.34 Recovered approximately 1.0 gallon of product from RW-2,RW-4 and <br /> 11/9/05 W-6 using bailing recovery method. Reinstalled SoakEZ socks in <br /> RW-4 14.21 15.58 1.37 101.41 RW-2 and RW-6. Ending recovery tank volume approximately 7.2 <br /> RW-5 - 14.16 - - alions. <br /> RW-6 1 14.84 15.07 1 0.23 1 3.57 <br /> FOURTH QUARTER 2005 GROUNDWATER MONITORING EVENT (NOVEMBER 8 AND 9, <br /> 2005) <br /> Field Observations <br /> On November 8, 2005, a Condor representative measured water levels at the three Site monitoring wells <br /> (MW-1, MW-2, and MW-3) and the six Site recovery wells (RW-1 through RW-6). On November 9, <br /> 2005, field observations were recorded at the monitoring wells and groundwater samples were collected <br /> for laboratory analyses from MW-1 through MW-3 and the two facility sumps (SE sump and SW sump). <br /> Field observations included the appearance of samples (color, clarity, and presence of petroleum product <br /> sheen or phase in samples) and collection of water quality field parameters. No petroleum hydrocarbon <br /> odors, petroleum hydrocarbon sheen or separate phase petroleum were noted in the field inspection <br /> samples collected from the monitoring wells(see attached field forms). <br /> Groundwater Gradient <br /> The average groundwater elevation measured in the three Site monitoring wells on November 8, 2005 <br /> decreased by 0.16 feet since the previous monitoring event conducted on August 17, 2005. Groundwater <br /> elevation measurements from the current event indicate that the average depth to groundwater was <br /> approximately 14.70 feet below the well collar survey points. The estimated groundwater gradient of <br /> 0.0027 ft/ft to the east-northeast was calculated using water level data from monitoring wells MW-1, <br /> MW-2, and MW-3, and is consistent with historic monitoring events. A copy of the groundwater <br /> measurement field form is attached. <br /> Laboratory Analytical Results <br /> The groundwater samples collected from monitoring wells MW-1 through MW-3, and the SE and SW <br /> sumps were analyzed for total petroleum hydrocarbons quantified as diesel (TPH-D), motor oil (TPH- <br /> MO), and kerosene (TPH-K) by EPA Method 8015M. TPH-D was detected in the SW sump at 2.44 <br /> milligrams per liter (mg/L) and at 0.106 mg/L in MW-2. TPH-D, TPH-MO, and TPH-K were not <br /> detected at or above the laboratory reported detection limits in the groundwater samples collected from <br /> monitoring wells MW-1, MW-3, or the SE sump during the fourth quarter 2005 monitoring event. <br /> Laboratory analytical results for monitoring wells and sumps were consistent with historic groundwater <br /> monitoring data (see Table A, attached). The samples were analyzed by Excelchem Environmental Labs <br /> 4F% <br /> a CONDOR <br />