Laserfiche WebLink
a <br /> m - - ,.• _- Report-Sail and Groundwater Investigation <br /> Gateway Project,City of Siock[fon4. <br /> _ <br /> April 10,2600 <br /> a- Page-6- . <br /> r the soil samples._. Petroleum-hydro6arboin odors were.not.noted for the field-observation soil samples <br /> collected from GN`at approximately 19.5, 23:5, 27.5 and 3 I:S feet bgs: <br /> Native soil-appeared to'beiencountered In GP5 at approximately 4 feet.bgs.s Clay and sandy clay were <br /> generally encountered down to the total depth of the boring k approximately 24 feet bgs.- Similar to GPI <br /> through GP4, field:,observations generally indicated thatstiff clay was encountered°in GPS between <br /> approximately II and 12 feet bgs. Generally soft, damp-to wet sandy.and/or silty clay was encountered <br /> from approximately. 12 to-24 feet bgs in GP5: PID measurement of 7.1, 4:2, 3.0, and 5.0 ppm total <br /> H <br /> -. organic vapors were recorded for the field observation soil samples collected from GP5:at approximately <br /> 11.5, 15.5,--l.9.5 and 23.5 feet bgs. It should be noted that PID readings that are just above the instrument <br /> detection limit of 1 ppm total organic vapors may not be representative of actual petioleum hydrocarbon <br /> r. concentrations in the soil samples. Petroleum hydrocarbon odors were not noted for the field observation <br /> soil samples collected from GP5 at approximately 19.5, 23.5, 27.5 and 31.5 feet bgs. <br /> 3.4 GEOPROBE ,GROUNDWATER SAMPLING , <br /> _ <br /> Groundwater was encounter <br /> � ed during the'field work at approximately 25,u 15, 24, and'l 7,feet bgs in GPI <br /> b GP2, GP4,--and GP5;`respectively. Grounifwater,was not.encountered in GP3. The generally very fine- <br /> grained soil encountered in the Geoprobe borings prevented determination-of the static groundwater level <br /> in the borings- In each of borings GP 1, GP2; GP4, and GP5, it appearsthat the depth ithat groundwater <br /> was encountered at,was representative of seepage into the boring in sandier zones, and was not <br /> representative of long term, static water table conditions. While moisture was present-in the relatively <br /> sandy horizon encountered in GP3 (between-12 and 24 feet bgs), not enough groundwater was present to <br /> fill the boring with dmeasurable quantity of groundwater <br /> A groundwater sample was collected from GP 1, GP2, GP4, and GP5 using the Geoprobe sampler. The <br /> sampler utilized a sealed, _water-tight, 1 stainless steel sample chamber- and PVC screen. When <br /> groundwater was encountered, the sampler was deployed:- The sample chamber-was opened by pulling <br /> _ back on the body of the sampler', exposing the screen...When the screen was full, agroundwater.sample <br /> was retrieved by manually pumping (raising and.lowering) the sample chamber with'a clean, single-use. <br /> length of polyethylene tubing containing a.'Neck valve at the submerged end. <br /> W -s_. CONDOR <br />