Laserfiche WebLink
�y <br /> Mr Harlin Knoll N <br /> San Joaquin County Environmental Health Division <br /> • 7 July 2000 <br /> Page 4 <br />!, recorded These measurements were made to confirm that the well was purged <br /> sufficiently Water samples were collected after the measurements stabilized to within <br /> 10 percent of the previous readings Purging and sampling logs are provided in <br /> Attachment 6 Sampling was performed using a 2-inch-diameter Teflon and disposable <br /> polyethylene bailers suspended from a nylon line The Teflon bailer was <br /> decontaminated between each well use The balers were equipped with a bottom- <br /> release device The waste disposal form and manifest for the sampling wastewater are <br /> provided in Attachment 7 <br /> Water samples were collected from the wells in new 40-milliliter glass bottles with <br /> Teflon-lined caps provided by the analytical laboratory These samples were collected <br /> rso that no headspace was present in the bottle A field blank was not collected because <br /> the wells were sampled using disposable bailers The samples were delivered to Positive <br /> Lab Service for analysis <br /> In January and May 2000, groundwater samples from well MW-1 (installed near the <br /> former source area) contained no detectable amounts of TPHg or BTEX A small amount <br /> of MTBE was detected in MW-1 at a concentration of 7 9 µg/I during the first round of <br /> sampling and 4 0 µg/l during the second round Upgradient well MW-2 contained <br /> lie TPHg concentrations of 91 µg/1 during the first round of sampling and 440 µg/I from the <br /> second round, MTBE was not detected in either round of sampling The samples from <br /> cross-gradient well MW-3 did not contain detectable concentrations of TPHg, BTEX, and <br /> MTBE after both rounds of groundwater sampling Analytical results from the <br /> groundwater sampling are summarized in Table 2 <br />' In EPA's Drinking Water Advisory Consumer Acceptability Advice and Health Effects <br /> Analysis on MTBE (EPA-822-F-97-009 December 1997), they state regarding MTBE "that <br /> keeping concentrations in the range of 20 to 40 micrograms per liter (µg/1) of water or <br /> below will likely avert unpleasant taste and odor effects" Additionally, the State of <br /> California has proposed primary drinking water standards as a public health goal for <br /> MTBE of 13 µg/I Although these values are proposed as goals and considered low by <br /> the industry, the concentrations of MTBE found in the shallow, unused groundwater at <br /> the site are below these aggressive objectives <br /> Groundwater Flow Characteristics <br /> Groundwater was encountered during drilling activities at a depth of 25 feet below grade <br /> During groundwater sampling, the depth to groundwater was measured in MW-1 at <br /> 17 78 feet below grade, MW-2 at 17 27 feet below grade, and MW-3 at 17 86 feet below <br /> grade Currently, groundwater flow direction is to the northeast based on depth to <br /> groundwater and conversations with City of Stockton water department personnel In a <br /> S\BFS\STOCKTON\LTR\LTR004 DOC 717100 <br />