My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS XR0007776
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
E
>
EL DORADO
>
632
>
3500 - Local Oversight Program
>
PR0505525
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS XR0007776
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/15/2019 5:39:03 PM
Creation date
7/15/2019 3:45:27 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
3500 - Local Oversight Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS
FileName_PostFix
XR0007776
RECORD_ID
PR0505525
PE
2953
FACILITY_ID
FA0002387
FACILITY_NAME
KEYSTONE AUTOMOTIVE INDUSTRIES INC
STREET_NUMBER
632
Direction
S
STREET_NAME
EL DORADO
STREET_TYPE
ST
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95203
APN
14907033
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
632 S EL DORADO ST
P_LOCATION
01
P_DISTRICT
001
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\wng
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
27
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
05 April 1996 ' <br />AGE -NC Project No 95-0142' <br />,Page 4 of 5 - <br />43 DISSOLVED METALS IN GROUND WATER <br />The presence of dissolved metals in ground water can reduce the permeability of the saturated zone <br />soils during in-situ _air sparging Total dissolved iron and manganese were detected at 80 and 510 <br />mg/l (milligrams per liter or parts per million ppm), respectively The concentrations of dissolved iron <br />in the ground water sample exceeds the_ concentration of 20 ppm or less for effective in-situ air <br />sparging The long term effectiveness of each air-sparging well may be diminished if concentrations <br />of dissolved iron remain above 20 ppm The laboratory report (FGL Lab No 631269-1) and chain -of - <br />custody are included in Appendix C <br />44 ANALYTICAL RESULTS OF PURGED WATER SAMPLES <br />TPH-g and BTE&X were not detected in samples collected from either drum at the site The <br />laboratory report (MAI Laboratory I D Nos 62337 and -62338) and chain -of -custody are included <br />in Appendix B <br />5.0. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS <br />5 1 HYDROCARBON -IMPACTED GROUND WATER <br />Ground water gradient calculations based upon data collected during the March 1996 sampling <br />indicates that flow direction at the eastern edge of the site has rotated approximately 10° to the east <br />The greatest concentrations of hydrocarbons present during the March 1996 sampling event were <br />present in VE -3, immediately east of the former UST excavation ' <br />Between December 1995 and March 1996, concentrations of petroleum hydrocarbons decreased in <br />MW -3 and MW -4 Based upon the most recent ground water data, the ground water surface lies <br />above the tops of the screened casings of MW -1, MW -2 and MW -3, and therefore, samples collected <br />from these wells may not be representative of actual aquifer conditions <br />We do not recommend the installation of additional ground water monitoring wells at this time <br />However, additional wells may be required in the future, if the local and regional ground water <br />elevation continues to remain at the current level or if the dissolved hydrocarbon plume migrates <br />south of MW -2 or northeast of MW -4 <br />Y <br />The next quarterly ground water monitonng should be scheduled for June 1996, if ground water <br />elevations are within the screened intervals, wells MW -1 through MW -4 should be sampled Vapor <br />well VE -1 and VE -3 should be sampled to determine the dissolved hydrocarbon concentrations in the <br />vicinity of the former UST <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.