Laserfiche WebLink
05 April 1996 ' <br />AGE -NC Project No 95-0142' <br />,Page 4 of 5 - <br />43 DISSOLVED METALS IN GROUND WATER <br />The presence of dissolved metals in ground water can reduce the permeability of the saturated zone <br />soils during in-situ _air sparging Total dissolved iron and manganese were detected at 80 and 510 <br />mg/l (milligrams per liter or parts per million ppm), respectively The concentrations of dissolved iron <br />in the ground water sample exceeds the_ concentration of 20 ppm or less for effective in-situ air <br />sparging The long term effectiveness of each air-sparging well may be diminished if concentrations <br />of dissolved iron remain above 20 ppm The laboratory report (FGL Lab No 631269-1) and chain -of - <br />custody are included in Appendix C <br />44 ANALYTICAL RESULTS OF PURGED WATER SAMPLES <br />TPH-g and BTE&X were not detected in samples collected from either drum at the site The <br />laboratory report (MAI Laboratory I D Nos 62337 and -62338) and chain -of -custody are included <br />in Appendix B <br />5.0. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS <br />5 1 HYDROCARBON -IMPACTED GROUND WATER <br />Ground water gradient calculations based upon data collected during the March 1996 sampling <br />indicates that flow direction at the eastern edge of the site has rotated approximately 10° to the east <br />The greatest concentrations of hydrocarbons present during the March 1996 sampling event were <br />present in VE -3, immediately east of the former UST excavation ' <br />Between December 1995 and March 1996, concentrations of petroleum hydrocarbons decreased in <br />MW -3 and MW -4 Based upon the most recent ground water data, the ground water surface lies <br />above the tops of the screened casings of MW -1, MW -2 and MW -3, and therefore, samples collected <br />from these wells may not be representative of actual aquifer conditions <br />We do not recommend the installation of additional ground water monitoring wells at this time <br />However, additional wells may be required in the future, if the local and regional ground water <br />elevation continues to remain at the current level or if the dissolved hydrocarbon plume migrates <br />south of MW -2 or northeast of MW -4 <br />Y <br />The next quarterly ground water monitonng should be scheduled for June 1996, if ground water <br />elevations are within the screened intervals, wells MW -1 through MW -4 should be sampled Vapor <br />well VE -1 and VE -3 should be sampled to determine the dissolved hydrocarbon concentrations in the <br />vicinity of the former UST <br />