Laserfiche WebLink
I . OS April 2003 <br /> AGE-NC Project 02-0946 ' <br />' Page 6 of 7 <br /> 4.0. FINDINGS <br /> Boring log soil descriptions were utilized to model the subsurface soil profile at the site The unpact <br /> to soil and ground water was assessed from laboratory analytical data obtained from samples <br /> collected during the well installation and subsequent sampling Ground water elevation, flow <br /> direction, and gradient were determined from field data collected on 27 February 2003 <br /> 41 STRATIGRAPHY <br /> Generally,moderate to dark yellowish brown,dry to damp,silty clay,clayey silt and silty sand were <br /> encountered from surface grade to 15 feet bsg In well borings MW-1 through MW-3 Moderate <br /> yellowish brown to olive gray, damp to saturated, lean clay, silty clay and silt were encountered <br /> between 20 to 35 feet bsg Olive gray to dark olive gray, saturated clayey silty sand, silt and clayey <br /> silt were encountered at 40 feet bsg Moderate yellowish brown, damp to moist, clayey sand and <br /> poorly graded sand were encountered in borings MW-1 and MW-3 between 15 and 20 feet bsg and <br /> 25 feet bsg, respectively The coarser-grained intervals encountered in borings MW-I and MW-3 <br /> appear to be laterally discontinuous Cross section A-A' is provided in Figure 4 Boring logs <br />� . generated from data collected during the monitoring well installation are included in Appendix A <br /> 42 ANALYTICAL RESULTS OF SOIL SAMPLES <br /> A total of 9 soil samples were analyzed as described in Section 3 4 TPH-d was detected in soil <br /> samples MW-1-15 and MW-1-25 at concentrations of 130 mg/kg and 43 mg/kg, respectively No <br /> other analytes of concern were detected at or above laboratory reporting limits in the other soil <br /> samples collected from the site <br /> Analytical results of soil samples are summarized on Table 1 The laboratory reports CTEL <br /> Yt p rY ( <br /> Laboratory Ids 0302-174-1 through 0302-174-9), quality assurance,and quality control (QA/QC) <br /> report and chain-of-custody forms are included in Appendix D <br /> 4 3 GROUND WATER GRADIENT AND FLOW DIRECTION <br /> Depth to ground water was measured at between 33 60 feet and 34055 feet bsg in wells MW-1 <br />' through MW-3 on 27 February 2003 Relative ground water elevations at the site ranged from 32 97 <br /> feet below MSL In well MW-2 to 34 55 feet below MSL In well'MW-3 (Table 2) Ground water <br />' flow direction was inferred to be toward the southeast at a gradient of approximately 0 01 ft/ft <br /> • Figure 3 depicts the contours for February 2003 <br /> I <br /> Advanced GeoEnvironmental,Ine- <br />