Laserfiche WebLink
' Bank of Stockton - Cutter Lumber Site Page 7 <br /> Groundwater Monitoring Well Construction <br />' Project No 102 2 <br /> April 24, 1998 <br />' 2.2.2 Groundwater Monitoring <br /> At the suggestion of the LOP enforcement officer, the wells were sampled within <br />' 24 hours of the well development as described above The sampling was <br /> performed without additional purging On March 13, 1998 Del-Tech personnel <br />' returned to the site to collect groundwater samples <br /> A stainless steel bailer was used to collect each sample Bailer cleanliness was <br />' verified by collecting a bailer blank (pouring distilled water through the bailer <br /> and collecting it in a VOA vial) prior to collecting the analytical sample Before <br /> and in between uses, all sampling equipment was washed using a portable <br />' steam cleaner Disposable gloves were worn by the sampling technician while <br /> collecting all samples The gloves were changed between the collection of each <br /> sample to reduce the potential for cross-contamination <br />' Extreme care was exercised while collecting samples to prevent agitation of the <br /> water contained in the bailer Water samples were transferred from the bailer <br />' into 40 ml VOA vials preserved with hydrochloric acid and 1 liter capacity amber <br /> glass bottles (provided by the analytical laboratory) All samples were checked <br /> liefor head space bubbles, labeled, inserted into foam holders and placed in an ice <br /> chest cooled to 4°C for transport to the laboratory <br /> The two pre-existing, groundwater monitoring wells, MW-1 and MW-4 were also <br /> i <br /> monitored and sampled Stagnant water in these wells was purged using a <br /> stainless steel bailer belayed with a servo actuated electric reel The rate of well <br /> t purging was monitored, and the well was purged of at least three casing volumes <br /> until the groundwater parameters (temperature, conductivity, and pH) had <br /> stabilized (Appendix C) indicating that water, representative of actual aquifer <br /> conditions, was entering the well Groundwater parameter stabilization was <br /> characterized by three successive readings within 10 percent After the wells <br /> had been allowed to recharge to at least 80 percent of their original volume, <br /> samples were collected using the methods described above <br />' 2.3 Waste Disposal <br />' During drilling, a total of 34 drums were filled with soil cuttings The drums <br /> were labeled and stored on site pending profiling and proper disposal Manley & <br /> Sons was contacted to pick-up and dispose of the soil at Forward Inc , a Class II <br /> I <br /> landfill located in Stockton On March 24, 1998, the soil was properly disposed <br /> . of as non-hazardous waste Documents relating to the soil disposal are herein <br /> attached as Appendix E <br />' 2937 Veneman Ave ,#B240 Geo-Phase Environmental Inc Phone (209) 569-0293 <br /> Modesto, CA 95356 Fax (209) 569-0293 <br />