|
I%" -
<br />ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH DEPARTMENT
<br />SAN RAMON CA 94583
<br />RE: former Tracy Diner
<br />95 W. 11th Street
<br />Tracy, CA. 95376
<br />Site Code: RO#727
<br />APN: 233-130-24
<br />CUF Claim #: 017963
<br />San Joaquin County Environmental Health Department (EHD) has reviewed the
<br />Schedule of Activities, proposed by you and faxed to EHD on April 22, 2004, and has the
<br />following comments.
<br />On April 12, 2004, EHD commented on a recently submitted report that detailed the
<br />findings of two of three activities approved by EHD for the wort[ plan you submitted on -
<br />November 3, 2003. The activities completed were the destruction of three of the five on-
<br />site monitoring wells (MW -1, 3, and 4) and the subsequent soil over -excavation to
<br />remove petroleum -contaminated soils. The last phase of the approved work plan,
<br />Interim Soil Remediation Work Plan, was to replace the destroyed monitoring wells. A
<br />date for installation of the replacement wells was not provided, so EHD requested a
<br />schedule for completion of the remaining, required work.
<br />The Schedule of Activities contained a condition that two monitoring wells, MW -6 and
<br />MW -7, would be installed by June 25, 2004 "upon payment for services previously
<br />performed....". A map showing the proposed location for the two wells has not been
<br />provided. In addition, MW -5 has been damaged and there is no proposal for repair or
<br />destruction and replacement of that well.
<br />EHD has been supportive of your activities at this site, including providing information to
<br />your financial institution and bonding company. Since you were successful in securing
<br />your loan, you can now continue to aggressively investigate and remediate your site, as
<br />you agreed to previously.
<br />The 'conditional' schedule to install only two of three destroyed monitoring wells is
<br />inadequate. Especially since MW -2 was accidentally destroyed during over -excavation
<br />activities and MW -5 is damaged. This leaves the site with no monitoring wells for
<br />sampling the ground water and evaluating the affects of the over -excavation and mass
<br />removal.
<br />SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY
<br />ar a
<br />Donna K. Heran, R.E.H.S.
<br />Director
<br />304 East Weber Avenue, Third Floor
<br />Unit Supervisors
<br />Carl Bergman, R.E.H.S.
<br />• , :"•
<br />Al Olsen, R.E.H.S.
<br />Stockton, California 952.02-2708
<br />Mike Huggins, R.E.H.S., R.D.I.
<br />R. S.
<br />Douglas W. s, R.E.H.SR..,
<br />�Q.. .gip
<br />Program Manager
<br />Telephone: (209) 468-3420
<br />Margaret Lagorio, R.E.H.S.
<br />Laurie A. Cotulla, R.E.H.S.
<br />Fax: (209) 464-0138
<br />Robert McClellon, R.E.H.S.
<br />Program Manager
<br />Mark Barcellos, R.E.EI.S.
<br />JOSEPH & ROSANNA PANETTA
<br />PO
<br />Box 1072
<br />MAY 0
<br />5 2004
<br />SAN RAMON CA 94583
<br />RE: former Tracy Diner
<br />95 W. 11th Street
<br />Tracy, CA. 95376
<br />Site Code: RO#727
<br />APN: 233-130-24
<br />CUF Claim #: 017963
<br />San Joaquin County Environmental Health Department (EHD) has reviewed the
<br />Schedule of Activities, proposed by you and faxed to EHD on April 22, 2004, and has the
<br />following comments.
<br />On April 12, 2004, EHD commented on a recently submitted report that detailed the
<br />findings of two of three activities approved by EHD for the wort[ plan you submitted on -
<br />November 3, 2003. The activities completed were the destruction of three of the five on-
<br />site monitoring wells (MW -1, 3, and 4) and the subsequent soil over -excavation to
<br />remove petroleum -contaminated soils. The last phase of the approved work plan,
<br />Interim Soil Remediation Work Plan, was to replace the destroyed monitoring wells. A
<br />date for installation of the replacement wells was not provided, so EHD requested a
<br />schedule for completion of the remaining, required work.
<br />The Schedule of Activities contained a condition that two monitoring wells, MW -6 and
<br />MW -7, would be installed by June 25, 2004 "upon payment for services previously
<br />performed....". A map showing the proposed location for the two wells has not been
<br />provided. In addition, MW -5 has been damaged and there is no proposal for repair or
<br />destruction and replacement of that well.
<br />EHD has been supportive of your activities at this site, including providing information to
<br />your financial institution and bonding company. Since you were successful in securing
<br />your loan, you can now continue to aggressively investigate and remediate your site, as
<br />you agreed to previously.
<br />The 'conditional' schedule to install only two of three destroyed monitoring wells is
<br />inadequate. Especially since MW -2 was accidentally destroyed during over -excavation
<br />activities and MW -5 is damaged. This leaves the site with no monitoring wells for
<br />sampling the ground water and evaluating the affects of the over -excavation and mass
<br />removal.
<br />
|