Laserfiche WebLink
concerning the Lincoln Center investigation from him or his <br /> consultants <br /> After review of several quarters of monitoring data it became <br /> apparent that some type of ground water removal was needed for <br /> migration control . Offsite monitor wells (MW5, MW6 , MW7 and <br /> MW10) were periodically showing increases in gasoline range <br /> hydrocarbons, most notable the BTEX' s . With the installation of <br /> two additional down gradient monitor wells (MW11 and MW12) the <br /> extent of the gasoline range plume was defined, with MW11 being <br /> below detection limits and MW12 displaying minor amounts of <br /> benzene 5 . 3 ug/L, toluene 1 . 9 ug/L and xylenes 2 . 1 ug/L. For a <br /> short period of time we were periodically (twice weekly) purging <br /> wells MW1, MW2, MW3 , MW8 and MW10 (2 to 27 gallons per well) with <br /> vacuum lift; removing water from the top of the aquifer at these <br /> wells . The wells that were purged contained significant gasoline <br /> range hydrocarbons Purging was initiated on December 1, 1992 <br /> and was ceased on August 30, 1993 when we were notified by <br /> Wickland that a representative of Lincoln Center voiced a concern <br /> to Wickland Properties that this activity might exacerbate the <br /> Lincoln Center ground water problem The periodic purging of <br /> selected wells was chosen due to the unlikelihood of influencing <br /> the Lincoln Center plume and the need to perform some type of <br /> ground water removal for migration control This activity was <br /> capturing and controlling the down gradient movement of the <br /> gasoline range plume until it was discontinued This is evident <br /> with the decrease in contaminant levels in MW12 from December, <br /> 1992 until September 1993 , at which time the levels again started <br /> to increase, see Table 1 <br /> Vapor extraction does have some influence on migration control, <br /> so it is important to have the vapor extraction system operate as <br /> much as possible The REMOX system has maintained, for the most <br /> part, better than 70% operation On a scheduled site visit on <br /> December 22 , 1993 , the WEGE technician found the system off. At <br /> that time a San Joaquin County PHS/EHD staff member was <br /> conducting a site visit and informed the technician that the <br /> equipment was probably turned off due to the Lincoln Center <br /> problem The equipment was left off until a letter dated <br /> December 30 , 1993 from San Joaquin County PHS/EHD clarifying that <br /> the communications between PHS/EHD staff and WEGE technician was <br /> misconstrued. <br /> WEGE continues to screen for the Lincoln Center plume . 1, 2, - <br /> dicholoroezhane (DCE) , zrichioroechylene (TCE an'" <br /> tetrachloroethylene (PCE) in the vapor stream. These have not <br /> been detected and results of ground water analyses utilizing EPA <br /> Method 624 on monitoring wells MW1 and MW6, collected on <br /> September 29, 1993 , were below detection limits . <br /> The San Joaquin County Health letter dated February 18, 1994 <br /> listed three items they wished addressed. Item 3 of this letter <br /> recommends that we additionally analyze the ground water using <br /> EPA Metod 601 at the next quaterly ground water sampling As you <br /> 3 <br />