Laserfiche WebLink
` ' t 1 <br /> LSA ASSOCIATES,INC. <br /> INITIAL STUDY/ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENTATION <br /> JULY 2000 STOCKTON METRO POLI TAN AIRPORT <br /> SPECIAL PURPOSE PLAN <br /> The traffic analysis was revised(June 2000)to address all development areas, resulting in an <br /> overall reduction in average daily vehicles. The revised project trip generation estimates <br /> from Rajappan & Meyer show that total daily trips from the project development areas <br /> F (Airport East, Air Metro Park,and Airport West) are reduced by 20 percent(from 76,651 to <br /> 61,860) from the previous projections(Airport East and Air Metro Park). This reduction in <br /> total vehicular trips would represent a decrease of approximately 20 percent in total air <br /> F pollutant emissions from the project sites. <br /> The revised total project trips(61,860)for the Airport East development area is only two <br /> percent higher than the total trips(60,716)from the previous projections. There will be no <br /> measurable changes in either the total vehicular emissions from the project nor the local CO <br /> concentrations at affected intersections. <br /> FWould the project: <br /> Ft a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable air quality plan? <br /> No impact. The proposed project is consistent with the Air Quality Attainment Plan <br /> prepared by the San Joaquin Valley Unified Air Pollution Control District <br /> (SJUVAPCD) as it includes land uses that were similar to those adopted in the <br /> Master Plan which is now included in the County's General Plan. <br /> b) Violate any air quality standard or contribute substantially to an existing or <br /> projected air quality violation? <br /> Potentially significant unless mitigated. Project implementation will have an effect <br /> t an air quality both during construction and over the long-term. During construction, <br />` depending on the size of the area being graded,temporary threshold exceedances for <br /> criteria pollutants could occur, both from the project and from cumulative <br /> construction activity. Impacts can be reduced to levels less than significant by <br /> controlling the size of development at a given time and by implementing the <br /> measures from the Master Plan EIR document dealing primarily with fugitive dust <br /> Fcontrol (SJUVAPCD Regulation VIII). These measures are repeated below: <br /> Airport Master Plan Mitigation: <br /> Mitigation Measure AQ-1: Implement the measures in the San Joaquin Valley <br /> F Unified Air Pollution Control District's Regulation VIII. <br /> Mitigation Measures <br /> F Air-1 SJVUAPCD Regulation VIII Control Measures for Construction Emissions sslons of PMIo, <br /> are required to be implemented at all construction sites. <br /> (A) All disturbed areas, including storage piles,which are not being actively <br /> utilized for construction purposes, shall be effectively stabilized of dust <br /> emissions using water,chemical stabilizer/suppressant, or vegetative ground <br /> cover. <br /> (B) All on-site unpaved roads and off-site unpaved access roads shall be <br /> F! effectively stabilized of dust emissions using water or chemical <br /> stabilizer/suppressant. <br /> F <br /> 7/20/00(P:\SJC0301EnvironmentaiNinitial study.wpd) <br /> F! 28 <br />