SU0012766 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Ell are evaluated in comparison to the proposed project. The following is a brief description of project alternatives evaluated in this draft EIR. All alternatives are evaluated for the year 2015, which is the same planning horizon year as the proposed project. 4 Existing No-Project Alternative F Under this alternative,existing 1996 conditions,as described in Table 3-1,would remain into the future. This alternative is the same as the conditions described under the "Setting" section of each impact chapter. This alternative is compared to the proposed project to determine"on-the-ground" impacts related to the project, including land use, drainage and water quality, vegetation and wildlife, and public services and facilities. F2015 Base No-Project Alternative This alternative considers conditions in 2015 without implementation of the proposed Master Plan, General Plan amendments, Development Title amendments, and zoning reclassifications. Under this alternative, development would occur under existing land use designations and zoning. ` It is assumed that growth in commuter and general aviation associated with regional population increases would still occur and that 260 acres of the Airport East property would be developed (as opposed to 312 acres under the proposed project). Development of the remaining portions of the . Master Plan area by 2015 would remain unchanged from those assumptions used for the proposed ' project. Table 3-1 identifies assumptions related to this alternative. �f F2015 Zero-Base No-Project Alternative This alternative also considers conditions in 2015 without implementation of the proposed F Master Plan, General Plan amendments, Development Title amendments, and zoning reclassifications. In addition, an assumption of this alternative is that growth in commuter and F` general aviation associated with regional population increases would still occur, but none of the Airport East property would be developed. Development of the remaining portions of the Master Plan area by 2015 would remain unchanged from those assumptions used for the proposed project Table 3-1 identifies assumptions related to this alternative. This alternative is compared to the proposed project to determine"worst-case"transportation and circulation, air quality, and noise impacts with and without development of the Airport East property. Stockton Metropolitan Airport Project Chapter 3. Project Description Draft Environmental Impact Report 3-15 March 20, 1998 F