My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SU0012823
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
B
>
BRANDT
>
13751
>
2600 - Land Use Program
>
ZR-92-13
>
SU0012823
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/10/2020 8:38:10 AM
Creation date
9/4/2019 10:36:20 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2600 - Land Use Program
RECORD_ID
SU0012823
PE
2666
FACILITY_NAME
ZR-92-13
STREET_NUMBER
13751
Direction
E
STREET_NAME
BRANDT
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
LODI
Zip
95240-
APN
01906029
ENTERED_DATE
1/10/2020 12:00:00 AM
SITE_LOCATION
13751 E BRANDT RD
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
004
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\sballwahn
Supplemental fields
FilePath
\MIGRATIONS\B\BRANDT\13751\ZR-92-13\SU-00-01\CORRESPOND.PDF
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
101
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
0 4"•" SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY <br /> r : � COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT <br /> • 1810 E HAZELTON AVE.,STOCKTON,CA 95205-6232 <br /> �4tlFURl��P DEVELOPMENT SERVICES PHONE:(209)468-3120 { <br /> PLANNING PHONE:(209)468-3120 November 9, 1 <br /> BUILDING PHONE:(209)468.3123 VVV <br /> NEIGHBORHOOD PRESERVATION PHONE:(209)468-3021 <br /> NOV 16 192 <br /> ENV PONMENTAL HEALTH <br /> Board of Supervisors KWIT a SWICES <br /> Courthouse <br /> Stockton, CA 95202 <br /> Dear Board Members: <br /> ZONE RECLASSIFICATION APPLICATION NO.ZR-92-13 OF JOE TARANTINO AND VICTOR AND <br /> ROLAND GOTTI (DIAMOND BAR) AND REPEAL OF THE SPECIFIC ROAD PLAN FOR SHARON <br /> DRIVE (SP-79-3) (DISTRICT 4) <br /> IT IS RECOMMENDED: <br /> That the Board of Supervisors: <br /> 1. Certify as adequate Final Environmental Impact Report No. ER-90-3 under the provisions of <br /> Section 15090 of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA); <br /> 2. Approve Zone Reclassification Application No ZR-92-13 based upon the 'Bases for Zone <br /> Reclassification' contained in the Staff Report; and <br /> 3. Approve the Resolution to Repeal the Sharon Drive Specific Road Plan (Attachment C); and <br /> 4. Adopt 'Findings of Significant Environmental Impact' (Attachment D) and a 'Statement of <br /> Overriding Considerations' (Attachment B). <br /> REASON FOR RECOMMENDATION: <br /> The request for Zone Reclassification would bring the site's zoning into conformance with the existing <br /> General Plan designation of R/L (Low Density Residential). The existing AU-20 zoning designation was <br /> placed on the project site because,,at the time the Draft 2010 General Plan Maps were being prepared, <br /> the required will-serve letter for public sewage disposal and water had not been received. The will-serve <br /> letter has been submitted and it is now appropriate to redesignate the site as R/L The underlying project, <br /> a Major Subdivision application,was approved by the Planning Commission on November 5, 1992,subject <br /> to approval of the Zone Reclassification application by the Board of Supervisors. The Major Subdivision <br /> is comprised of a 218-lot residential subdivision on a 124-acre parcel and contains 210 single-family <br /> residential lots, a 26-acre lake, a recreation center, a library/fire station site, a park site and four lots <br /> containing a total of 26.9 acres that will be further subdivided at a later date to accommodate <br /> approximately 79 single-family detached, clustered residences. <br /> The Planning Commission conducted a hearing for the Zone Reclassification application at its meeting <br /> of October 22, 1992. At the public hearing, Luis Arismendi spoke in favor of the proposal. Speaking in <br /> opposition to the subdivision was Ed Holden. He stated his concerns regarding the 26-acre lake's <br /> impacts on the area's water table. After considering all written and oral testimony, the Planning <br /> Commission voted 6-1 to make the above-listed recommendation to the Board of Supervisors. <br /> B <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.