Laserfiche WebLink
i <br /> 3.7 Description of Proposed or Expected Maximum (including second unit dwellings) septic <br /> tank usage an site. There are no immediate plans for any dwellings. However, each parcel <br /> Fis entitled to a primary home and a second unit dwelling. <br /> 4.0 GROUNDWATER INFORMATION SECTION: <br /> F <br /> 4.1 Description of the depth and gradient of groundwater in the general area: The depth to <br /> ground water in this area is approximately 160 feet according to the map of"Lines of Equal Depth <br /> 1 to Groundwater" published Spring, 1999, by the San Joaquin County Flood Control and Water <br /> + Conservation District. The gradient descends from east to west. <br /> 4.2 Description/Discussion of any existing and/or potential groundwater contamination issues <br /> in the general location of the site: The concerns for groundwater contamination in this area are <br /> deemed low due to the depths involved. Insecticides,pesticides, and fertilizers typically do not <br /> impact groundwater at these depths, however, as with any agricultural area, there is always potential <br /> for contamination due to chemicals used in the farming operation. <br /> M . 4.3 Description of location, type and construction of well and location where water sample(s) <br /> were obtained: There is no existing well on subject parcel. Subject parcel is used for grazingF1 3� <br /> purposes. Therefore, no water sample was taken. ` <br /> 4.4 Description of constituents being tested for in the water sample: N/A. <br /> 4.5 Description of how sample was obtained, handled, stored, and transported to the lab: NIA ( gJ <br /> 4.6 Complete Chain of Custody document, including printed and signed name of third party <br /> F, sampler, condition of sample and date and time the sample was submitted to the lab. For <br /> Laboratory samplers, complete laboratory report to include the above noted information: NIA <br /> 5.0 SOIL PROFILE INFORMATION SECTION: <br /> 5.1 Site map showing location, with dimensions, of the soil profile pit on the parcel: See Appendix. <br /> 5.2 Description of soil profile pit including depth and dimensions: The shallow test holes were <br /> prepared per County Standards. The holes were excavated to a depth of 42 inches and 8 inches in w� <br /> diameter. They were backfilled with 2 inches of"pea gravel." <br /> f 5.3 Description of soil lithology as noted from test pit by appropriate professional using <br /> industry standard protocol: The soil in this area is classified as Keyes-Redding Complex and 3� <br /> Redding Gravelly Loam as stated in the Soil Survey of San Joaquin County, California as provided <br /> by the United States Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service. <br /> 11 5.4 Discussion of soil lithology as related to future onsite septic uses: The Keyes-Redding <br /> I. Complex and Redding Gravelly Loam has very slow permeability. Thus; percolation rates were rte.J <br /> slow as demonstrated by the failure of the four shallow percolation tests. (See Appendix.) <br /> 2 <br /> 1 <br /> 606565oi1 Suitability Report 110608 <br />