SU0008578 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Phase I Environmental site Assessment f Neighborhoods D,K,L,and Town Center,Mountain House,California Page 4 Listings in publicly available records that do not have to be located geographically are not generally practically reviewable. For large databases with numerous facility records (such as RCRA hazardous waste generators and registered underground storage tanks), the records are not practically reviewable unless they can be obtained from the source agency in the smaller geographic area of zip codes. Even when information is provided by zip code for some large databases, it is common for an unmanageable number of sites to be identified within a given zip code. In these cases, it is not necessary to review the impact of all the sites that are likely to be listed in any given zip code; that information would not be practically reviewable. In other words, when so much data is generated that it cannot be feasibly reviewed for its impact on the property, it is not practically reviewable. ASTM 3.3.29 Publicly available — Information that is publicly available means that the source of the information allows access to the information by anyone upon request. ASTM 3.3.30 Reasonably ascertainable -- For purposes of both this practice and Practice E 1528, information that is (1)publicly available, (2) obtainable from its source within reasonable time and cost constraints, and (3)practically reviewable. ASTM 3.3.43 Visually and/or physically observed-- During a Site visit pursuant to Practice E 1528, or pursuant to this practice, this term means observations made by vision while walking through a property and the structures located on it and observations made by the sense of smell, particularly observations of noxious or foul odors. 1.4 USER RELIANCE,LIMITATIONS, AND EXCEPTIONS _ The scope of this project was presented in our proposal dated October 18, 2004, and work order agreement 4125KI dated October 20, 2004, and subsequently approved by the Client. Condor performed this environmental assessment in accordance with the guidelines set forth in the ASTM E-1527-00. The scope of work did not include other services that are not described in this report. Specifically excluded t from the scope of work are (1) the evaluation of the Site for the presence of asbestos, radon, mold, and lead-based paint, (2) a survey of the Site for wetlands or rare and endangered species, (3) a survey of the Site for historical or cultural resources, and(4)research into the title history of the Site. This ASTM Phase I ESA is thorough,but is not intended to identify all potential concerns, or to eliminate all risk of the subject properties bearing some degree of environmental liability. Condor cannot and will not warrant or certify that the Site is free of contaminants because it is impossible to know if such a condition'exists. Although risks can never be eliminated, more detailed and extensive investigations yield more information. This information may help you better manage your risks. Such detailed services involve greater expense. We ask our clients to participate in identifying the level of service that will provide them with an acceptable level of risk. Land use, Site conditions (both on-site and off-site), and other factors will change over time. Site activities and regulations beyond Condor's control could change at any time after the completion of this report. Our observations, findings, and opinions can be considered valid only as of the date of the Site visits/reconnaissance, November 12 and 15, 2004. If any changes are made or errors found in the information used for this report, the interpretations and conclusions contained herein shall not be considered valid unless the.changes or errors are reviewed by Condor and either appropriately modified or re-approved in writing. This report should not be relied upon after 180 days from the date of issuance (ASTM E-1527-00, Section 4.6). ow - La CONDO