My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SU0004551
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
J
>
JUNCTION
>
2684
>
2600 - Land Use Program
>
PA-0400077
>
SU0004551
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/7/2020 11:30:53 AM
Creation date
9/6/2019 10:34:00 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2600 - Land Use Program
RECORD_ID
SU0004551
PE
2687
FACILITY_NAME
PA-0400077
STREET_NUMBER
2684
Direction
E
STREET_NAME
JUNCTION
STREET_TYPE
DR
City
MANTECA
ENTERED_DATE
7/13/2004 12:00:00 AM
SITE_LOCATION
2684 E JUNCTION DR
RECEIVED_DATE
3/23/2004 12:00:00 AM
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
003
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\rtan
Supplemental fields
FilePath
\MIGRATIONS\J\JUNCTION\2684\PA-0400077\SU0004551\APPL.PDF \MIGRATIONS\J\JUNCTION\2684\PA-0400077\SU0004551\CDD OK.PDF \MIGRATIONS\J\JUNCTION\2684\PA-0400077\SU0004551\EH COND.PDF
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
27
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
� v <br /> A/G to R/R. The applicant states that the purpose of changing the General Plan would <br /> be to subdivide the remaining large parcel into 2-acre parcels. <br /> General Plan Issues <br /> In order to approve the General Plan Amendment, the Board of Supervisors will have to <br /> determine that the internal consistency of the General Plan is maintained in the adoption <br /> of the proposed General Plan Amendment. The Community Development Department <br /> has reviewed the proposed General Plan Amendment pre-application and offers the <br /> following comments: <br /> 2 Residential Development (Volume I p IV-18) <br /> Policy 1. (a) Rural Residential: <br /> (3) Locational Criteria: Appropriate in rural communities and only for areas of existing <br /> rural residential densities in urban communities. <br /> • The proposed General Plan Amendment request does not appear to meet the <br /> locational criteria listed for rural residential development. The parcels proposed for <br /> amendment are not located within an existing rural or urban community. <br /> A Community Organization and Development Patterns (Volume I p. IV-4 through 6) <br /> Objective 3. To minimize the effect on agricultural lands and other environmental <br /> resources while providing for orderly growth. <br /> • The proposed General Plan Amendment appears to be inconsistent with this <br /> objective of the General Plan because it will create disorderly residential growth in <br /> the center of an established agricultural area. <br /> Policy 5. Development shall be orderly and compact. <br /> • The proposed General Plan Amendment appears to be inconsistent with this policy <br /> because the amendment would result in a cluster of residential development in the <br /> center of an agricultural area outside of existing rural and/or urban communities. <br /> Policy 7. Residential, commercial, and industrial development shall be shown on <br /> the General Plan Map only in communities identified [in the General <br /> Plan], except in the following instances: <br /> (a) contiguous, industrial expansion of existing industrial areas; <br /> (b) Freeway Service areas; <br /> (c) Commercial Recreations areas; or <br /> (d) Truck Terminal areas. <br /> • The proposed General Plan Amendment appears to be inconsistent with this policy <br /> because it proposes a residential designation and future residential development <br /> 2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.