Laserfiche WebLink
( 1 t 1 ( I I <br /> 2. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY <br /> TABLE 2-1 <br /> SUMMARY OF IMPACTS AND MITIGATION MEASURES <br /> LEVEL OF <br /> SIGNIFICANCE <br /> ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT MITIGATION MEASURES AFTER MITIGATION <br /> LAND USE <br /> 4.2.1 The Proposed Project has the potential to conflict with The reader is directed to Sections 4.3,Agricultural Resources; Less-than-Significant <br /> existing and planned land uses surrounding the project 4.4,Transportation and Circulation;4.5,Noise;4.6,Air Quality; <br /> site. This would be a significant impact. 4.7,Geology,Soils and Seismicity;4.8,Hydrology and Water <br /> Quality;4.9,Biological Resources;4.10,Cultural Resources; <br /> 4.11,Hazards and Hazardous Materials;and 4.12,Visual <br /> Resources for a discussion of impacts and related mitigation as <br /> they relate to these impact areas. While most of the impacts can <br /> be mitigated to a less-than-significant level,there are impacts in <br /> Sections 4.3,Agricultural Resources,4.6,Air Quality,4.8, <br /> Hydrology and Water Quality,and 4.12,Visual Resources that <br /> are significant and unavoidable. Therefore,land use impacts <br /> associated with these resource sections are considered <br /> significant and unavoidable. <br /> 4.2.2 Consistency with applicable Land Use designations and No mitigation is required. <br /> policies. This would be a less-than-significant impact. <br /> 4.2.3 The Proposed Project will not conflict with any No mitigation is required. <br /> applicable habitat conservation plan or natural <br /> community conservation plan. This would be a less- <br /> than-significant impact. <br /> RMC Pacific Vernalis Quarry Mining and Reclamation Project 2-5 ESA/703015 <br /> Adminisinnive Dntt EIR March 2004 <br />