Laserfiche WebLink
CHAPTER 2 <br /> Comments on the <br /> Draft Environmental Impact Report <br /> This chapter includes comments on the Draft EIR received during the public comment period <br /> (see Chapter I for more detail). This chapter also includes additional correspondence received <br /> ` after the public comment period. <br /> 2.1 List of Commenters <br /> Table 2-1 provides a list of comment letters received. The comment letters are reproduced in <br /> ` Section 2.3 below and are identified by the letter code shown in the table below. <br /> TABLE 2-1 <br /> PERSONS AND AGENCIES COMMENTING ON THE DRAFT EIR <br /> .. <br /> Commenter Date Received Letter lode <br /> Weinberg, Roger,and Rosenfeld(LASER) July 5,2006 A <br /> Ills J. Phyllis Fox and Petra Pleas(LASER) July 5,2006 B <br /> Daniel T.Smith Jr.,P.E.(LASER) July 5,2006 C <br /> Stanislaus County Environmental Review Committee June 23,2006 D <br /> California Department of Transportation July 5,2006 E <br /> Department of Fish and Game July 5,2006 F <br /> Department of Conservation July 5,2006 G <br /> U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service July 6,2006 H <br /> San Joaquin County Public Works July 6,2006 <br /> San Joaquin Valley Unified Air Pollution Control District July 6,2006 J <br /> U.S.Army Corps of Engineers July 12,2006 K <br /> 2.2 Additional Correspondence <br /> Additional correspondence regarding the proposed project was received after the close of the <br /> I <br /> L DEIR comment period. That correspondence is discussed below and included in Section 2.3. <br /> San Joaquin County received a letter from the Department of Conservation's Office of Mine <br /> Reclamation(OMR) regarding the proposed reclamation plan, dated July 14, 2006, The County <br /> provided a response to OMR's comments, dated June 3, 2008. Both letters are included in this <br /> chapter. <br /> i_ <br /> Cerrex Vermis Quarry Mining and Reclamation Prale 2-1 ESA 1203015 <br /> Final Envaorinental Impact Report June 2008 <br /> L <br />