My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SU0004094
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
K
>
KOSTER
>
36736
>
2600 - Land Use Program
>
QX-01-0002
>
SU0004094
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/27/2020 1:02:10 PM
Creation date
9/6/2019 10:43:21 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2600 - Land Use Program
RECORD_ID
SU0004094
FACILITY_NAME
QX-01-0002
STREET_NUMBER
36736
Direction
S
STREET_NAME
KOSTER
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
TRACY
ENTERED_DATE
5/12/2004 12:00:00 AM
SITE_LOCATION
36736 S KOSTER RD
RECEIVED_DATE
1/8/2002 12:00:00 AM
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\wng
Supplemental fields
FilePath
\MIGRATIONS\K\KOSTER\36736\QX-01-02_PA-0200065\SU0004094\EIR 2004.PDF
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2073
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
result in significant impacts on the environment. Pursuant to the CEQA Guidelines, an EIR is the <br /> required environmental documentation for the County's consideration of the Project. <br /> CA. General Findings on Mitigation Measures <br /> In preparing the Conditions of Approval for this Project, County staff incorporated the mitigation <br /> measures recommended in the EIR. In the event that the Conditions of Approval or Mitigation <br /> Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMRP) do not use the exact wording of the mitigation <br /> measures recommended in the EIR, in each such instance, the adopted conditions of approval are <br /> controlling and are intended to be identical or substantially similar to the recommended <br /> mitigation measure. <br /> Findings: <br /> Unless specifically stated to the contrary in these findings, it is this Commission's intent to adopt <br /> all mitigation measures recommended by the EIR. If a measure has, through error, been omitted <br /> from the Conditions of Approval,from these Findings or from the MMRP, and that measure is <br /> not specifically refected in these Findings, that measure shall be deemed to be adopted pursuant <br /> to this paragraph. <br /> In addition, unless specifically stated to the contrary in these Findings, all Conditions of <br /> Approval and the Mitigation Monitoring Plan, repeating or rewording mitigation measures <br /> recommended in the EIR are intended to be substantially similar to the mitigation measures as <br /> worded in the EIR and are found to be equally effective in avoiding or lessening the identified <br /> environmental impact, even if minor wording changes have occurred. <br /> D. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS <br /> The County's staff report, the EIR, written and oral testimony at public hearings, and these <br /> findings and statement of overriding considerations and other information in the administrative <br /> record serve as the basis for the County's environmental determination. The Final EIR includes <br /> revisions to the Draft EIR, public comments and the County's responses. The detailed analyses <br /> of potential environmental impacts and proposed mitigation measures for the proposed Cemex <br /> Vernalis Quarry Mining and Reclamation Project are presented in the Draft EIR. Written <br /> comments and the County's responses, as well as some minor revisions to the impact and <br /> mitigation discussions, are provided in Part I of the Final EIR. <br /> Presented below are the environmental findings made by this Commission after its review of the <br /> documents referenced above, as well as the written and oral comments on the proposed Cemex <br /> Vernalis Quarry Mining and Reclamation Project presented at the Planning Commission public <br /> hearing. Factual discussion in this document summarizes the information contained in the EIR <br /> and the administrative record upon which this Commission bases its decision to certify the EIR <br /> and approve the project. <br /> The EIR prepared for the proposed Project evaluated eleven major environmental categories <br /> (land use; agricultural resources; traffic and circulation; noise; air quality; geology, soils, and <br /> seismicity; hydrology and water quality; biological resources; cultural resources; hazards and <br /> hazardous materials; and visual resources) for potential significant adverse impacts. Both project <br /> 4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.