Laserfiche WebLink
sensitive alternative than disturbing additional land elsewhere for a like resource. (Draft EIR, p. <br /> 5-4.) <br /> The California Division of Mines and Geology(CDMG) (now known as the California <br /> Geological Survey) has classified(14 CCR Section 3550.14) sectors containing Portland Cement <br /> Concrete (PCC) aggregate"an indispensable,high grade construction aggregate" in the project <br /> area including portions of the project site. The State Mining and Geology Board, upon the <br /> classification of this resource,has recognized,through their designation process, that these <br /> resources are regionally significant. (Draft EIR, p. 5-4.) <br /> The classification and designation of these resources is consistent with the Surface Mining and <br /> Reclamation Act (SMARA)of 1975 whereby the State Legislature found that"extraction of <br /> minerals is essential to the continued economic well-being of the State and the needs of the <br /> society." (Draft EIR,p. 5-4.) <br /> SMARA requires that all reclamation plans include"an assessment of the effect of <br /> implementation of the reclamation plan on future mining in the area."The San Joaquin County <br /> Development Title, Chapter 9-1415 recognizes SMARA and states that all approved Quarry <br /> Extraction Permits are subject to SMARA. (Draft EIR,p. 5-4.) <br /> Agricultural and domestic groundwater users extract groundwater from the upper unconfined <br /> aquifer for their primary source of water or to supplement surface water supplies. Although it has <br /> lower water quality, the upper, unconfined zone is a beneficial use aquifer and is an important <br /> water resource. (Draft EIR,p. 5-4.) <br /> Large mining operations that intersect or extend below groundwater levels cause groundwater to <br /> seep into the excavation and will rise to the approximate level of the surrounding groundwater. <br /> The influx of groundwater inundates the bottom of the mining excavation. Once the groundwater <br /> becomes surface water within the excavation, it is available for evaporation. Large surface areas <br /> and hot temperatures can accelerate evaporation rate and increase evaporation losses. If <br /> groundwater seeps into an excavation and is then evaporated, it can constitute a loss to the <br /> groundwater supply. These rates are relatively small compared to groundwater pumping but, in <br /> some cases, can represent a measurable groundwater loss. Groundwater seepage into a large <br /> excavation can also alter groundwater flow direction and flow gradients within the aquifer which <br /> thereby alters natural groundwater flow. (Draft EIR, p. 5-4.) <br /> Groundwater seepage and inundation within the active mining phase could cause a groundwater <br /> quality issue as surface water and pollutants from the surface commingle with the incoming <br /> groundwater. The degradation would be localized in areas where surface pollutants are present <br /> and are allowed to enter the water. The amount of unpolluted surface and groundwater would <br /> likely be sufficient to dilute pollutant loads to below regulatory action levels. (Draft EIR, p. 5-5.) <br /> With a deeper excavation below the groundwater level, the temporary and permanent slopes <br /> would be higher, thereby increasing the potential for slope instability. A portion of the slopes <br /> would be saturated,potentially increasing safety issues. The geologic material, its structure and <br /> attitude, and amount of groundwater can affect the potential for slope failure. Slope stability and <br /> the potential for slope failure would be increased with this alternative. (Draft EIR,p. 5-5.) <br /> 42 <br />