Laserfiche WebLink
LK E/NFELDER <br /> — . N9At Pepp'e.fl/9AISWWont. <br /> • A significant amount of additional soil staining was observed likely due to dry <br /> soil conditions compared to prevailing wet soil conditions observed in the <br /> 2006 ESA. Staining was observed associated with the diesel and gasoline <br /> ASTs in the dairy area and in the central portion of roadways near the <br /> primary dairy and in the vicinity of the central residential/farmhouse area. Soil <br /> staining/discoloration was also noted north of the milk barn. Surficial water <br /> ponding and discolored water noted in the prior ESA were generally not <br /> observed except in corral areas of the primary dairy operations. <br /> • A potential wash-down pad and maintenance area were noted on the eastern <br /> end of the main dairy area. <br /> • A large manure pile and manure drying area was noted by the southwest r <br /> corner of the main dairy area, which was not observed previously. <br /> • A large polyvinyl tank estimated at 2,000 gallons labeled as urea ammonium <br /> nitrate were noted in the central residential/farmhouse area on the northern <br /> parcel. A small leak was noted from this tank. <br /> • Soil pile locations in proximity to the dairy waste ponds were noted in different <br /> areas. No-hazardous materials, however, were observed. <br /> • Four domestic wells were sampled on the northern parcel. trate a N <br /> values in groundwater samples from three of four wells weFe below he <br /> applicable MCL of 10 mg/l. The backup domestic well DW-4 ocate ong <br /> the east central border had Nitrate as N values of 13 mg/I, just exceeding the <br /> primary MCL noted. DBCP was not detected in any of the four groundwater <br /> samples collected. <br /> 5.2. COMPARISON OF PRIOR CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS <br /> — <br /> The following summary of conclusions/recommendations numbered 1 through 26 were <br /> copied directly from the former ESA. Italicized comments are added based on the <br /> updated site reconnaissance and includes changes to the former conclusions and <br /> recommendations. <br /> In summary, the former ESA and updated reconnaissance has revealed evidence of <br /> recognized environmental conditions in connection with the property: <br /> 1. Concrete irrigation control structures and standpipes are located though out <br /> the orchards in the southern portion of the site. On properties with a history <br /> of agricultural use, underground pipelines may exist. It was common for <br /> said pipelines to contain asbestos (e.g., Transite pipe). A Transite <br /> standpipe was noted in the northeast corner of APN 205-100-17. <br /> Subsurface exploration is not a part of a typical Phase I Environmental Site <br /> 95428.E01/STOSR693 July 29, 2008 <br /> 0 2008 Kleinfelder Page 18 of 26 <br />