Laserfiche WebLink
145 <br /> • Since these Studies have been conducted specifically for a General Plan Amendment/Re-Zone <br /> Application,the primary disposal area and the required 100%reserve/replacement/addition areas <br /> that may eventually serve a commercial project have not been described,but will have to be <br /> extensively detailed for a proposed project and illustrated on a Site Plan. <br /> • Soil physical and chemical testing was conducted. Physical testing included percolation testing and <br /> particle size analysis to determine soil characteristics. Chemical testing included analyses for the <br /> constituents that influence nitrate loading. <br /> • The capacities of the on-site soils were analyzed: 1.)For the ability to accept potential future <br /> wastewater effluent flows,2.)To assess the characteristics of the on-site soil to mitigate nitrate <br /> impact, and 3.)To quantify nitrate impact potential to the underlying groundwater from percolating <br /> effluent and relate impact to the Porter-Cologne Water Act. This was accomplished by the <br /> referenced testing and loading calculations. <br /> • Although it is an EHD requirement that any on-site well for a project must be sampled and analyzed <br /> for specific constituents, the on-site irrigation well could not be sampled since there was no water in <br /> the well,and the pump was inoperable and could not be repaired. (.3) <br /> • Ultimate wastewater flow volumes emanating from a proposed project are unknown. Therefore,the <br /> nitrate loading calculations were formulated to theoretically estimate the number of people the <br /> subject property could support or assimilate without exceeding the Maximum Contaminant Level <br /> for nitrate,and the Porter-Cologne Water Act. The maximum number of on-site people(employees, <br /> customers,etc.)the subject property can assimilate daily without violating the Porter-Cologne <br /> Water Act has been calculated to be 150. <br /> The soils testing and investigation has found the indigenous soils under the test location,which was near the <br /> northeast comer of the property, to contain a predominately fine-grained clay material with unacceptable / <br /> percolation capabilities down to approximately six feet below grade. From 6 to 13 feet exists a poorly- 3� <br /> graded silty sand. From 13 to 16 feet is a clayey silty sand. From 16 to 22 feet is a silty fine sand and from <br /> 22 to 25 feet is a silty, clayey fine sand. The soils below eight feet possess percolative capacity as <br /> demonstrated by the percolation test results. Although the test results show acceptable permeability in the <br /> deeper soils, long-term acceptance rates of wastewater effluent by the indigenous soils will decrease over kto <br /> time. <br /> II. SOIL SUITABILITY STUDY FINDINGS <br /> A. SUBJECT PROPERTY AND SURROUNDING STUDY AREA INFORMATION <br /> SSS§ 1.1. Surrounding land use to the north is a grape vineyard, other types of agricultural production, and <br /> very low density housing. To the east is Bear Creek, the Highway 99 Frontage Road and Highway 99. To <br /> the west is another vineyard, a small residential structure and Micke Grove Road. The land use referenced <br /> is illustrated on the two San Joaquin County Parcel Viewer Maps found in Appendix A. <br /> LLhave <br /> 3.1,3.2,3.3,3.4,3.5,3.6,3.7,6.8. Applications on microfiche files with the EHD reveal that there <br /> been approximately nine permits issued for repairs/replacements/additions to existing systems within <br /> ne-half mile study area on the Highway 99 Frontage Road. This can be considered a very large numberrmits for the study area and indicates marginal soil permeability,especially in the top surface soils. <br /> 2 <br /> Chesney Consulting <br />