Laserfiche WebLink
IV. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS <br /> It is our opinion the subject site is suitable for its intended use with regard to septic effluent <br /> management and that potential environmental impact from nitrogen has been mitigated to an <br /> acceptable extent. <br /> The percolation rates obtained indicate a surprisingly permeable soil. If deemed by the <br /> Environmental Health Department, the permeability of the subsurface soils can be decreased by <br /> _ using the siltier, on-site surface material to impede percolation at the bottom of the leachline <br /> trenches. However, our calculations are based on the permeability of the soil eventually reaching <br /> an long term application rate (LTAR)of approximately 0.5 to 1.0 gals/ftZ/day due to biomat <br /> formation. Therefore, addition of a less permeable material may not be necessary. <br /> Without sophisticated groundwater monitoring over a long period of time, it is unknown as to the <br /> exact groundwater depth at different times of the year, as well as the groundwater directional <br /> flow. However, sufficient data has been collected and analyzed to determine that the <br /> groundwater table is currently an acceptable distance below grade for there to be adequate <br /> biological treatment, according to published scientific literature. Groundwater analyses of two <br /> wells in the area indicate a small-to-nonexistent impact to the underlying drinking water aquifers. <br /> The leachfields are designed to be perpendicular to the anticipated groundwater directional flow. <br /> Mounding effects under the leachfields should be of no concern since the saturated zone is at a <br /> sufficient depth. <br /> We do not recommend monitoring of the groundwater by the use of monitoring wells. We do <br /> recommend however,that as the Church continues to grow, an analyses of the vadose zone water <br /> under leachfield be completed. This should be done prior to the start of Phase H and certainly <br /> before the start of Phase III. Vadose zone water can be sampled by augering below the leachfield <br /> to obtain effluent samples. From these test results, a determination can be made regarding future <br /> design changes or further treatment of effluent. Accurate "as-builts" regarding the septic system <br /> should be supplied to the Environmental Health Department. <br /> The nitrate loading calculations demonstrate that under the leachfield,the groundwater will be <br /> theoretically impacted to 3 ppm over the current Maximum Contaminant Level (MCL) drinking <br /> water standards. But on an areal basis, the nitrogen contribution over the entire 15 acre site <br /> should be under the MCL and not impact the drinking water aquifers, nor the adjacent surface <br /> _ waters (the lagoon and Mokelumne River). As referenced,the influence from the river is <br /> substantial, based upon scientific studies. Predictability of relevant aspects of the underlying <br /> groundwater can only be made with long-term monitoring and sophisticated testing. <br /> To reduce septic tank loading, graywater originating from the baptistery may be used for <br /> landscape irrigation. However, graywater from the dishwasher must enter the septic system. <br /> t , <br /> (V 0J C6-ealr 54-j er�Jfr pr Nus t�c�c� <br /> 8 <br /> valfey Ag Pssearch <br />