SU0004483 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

The proposed General Plan Amendment does not appear to be consistent with the above !l_____1 TI__ 1 ___ ♦ LI'_ J•_.____1 7_1_7_ ' /_ /__ Genet ll Plan policy. H public sewage disposal system Is not available in the urban community of Morada and the applicant is not proposing one. General Plan Vol. 1, page IV-18 Residential Development Policy No. I (a) Rural Residential. (3) Locational Criteria: Appropriate in rural communities and only for areas of existing rural residential densities in urban communities. This proposal does not appear to be consistent with the above General Plan policy. This project would expand and become part of the urban community of Morada. The 51 acre project site consists of only one parcel and is not an area of existing rural residential densities. ZONE RECLASSIFICATION In order to approve a Zone Reclassification, the Board shall determine that the proposed zone is consistent with the General Plan, any applicable Master plan, and any applicable Specific Plan; and that the zone is reasonable and beneficial at the time. If the Board of Supervisors approves the General Plan Amendment to R/R,then the proposed Zone Reclassification would be consistent with the General Plan. There are no applicable Master Plans or Specific Plans. The Eight Mile Road Specific Plan starts at the railroad tracks and extends west. LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT/WILLIAMSON ACT The project includes a fee strip for access to Eight Mile Road. That would entail a three parcel lot line adjustment between the 50-acre southern parcel and the two 10-acre northern lots. In order to provide some distance between the railroad tracks and the subdivision entrance, and to provide a landscaped entrance,the access strip widens as it approaches Eight Mile Road. Because the northern properties are under Williamson Act Contract,the Lot Line Adjustment must conform to the following requirements(Government Code Section 51257[a]): (1) The new contract or contracts would enforceably restrict the adjusted boundaries of the parcel for an initial term for at least as long as the unexpired term of the rescinded contract or contracts, but for not less than 10 years. The lot line adjustment does not appear to meet this requirement because less than 10 years remain on the contract. The owner filed a Notice of Nonrenewal on January 30, 2003. (2) There is no net decrease in the mount of the acreage restricted. In cases where two parcels involved in a lot line adjustment are both subject to contracts rescinded pursuant to this section,this finding will be satisfied if the aggregate acreage of the land restricted by the new contracts is at least as great as the aggregate acreage restricted by the rescinded contracts. The lot line adjustment appears to meet this requirement. (3) At least 90 percent of the land under the former contact or contracts remains under the new contact or contracts. 2