My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SU0004764
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
Q
>
QUASHNICK
>
6125
>
2600 - Land Use Program
>
PA-0400776
>
SU0004764
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/7/2020 11:31:12 AM
Creation date
9/9/2019 8:58:49 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2600 - Land Use Program
RECORD_ID
SU0004764
PE
2691
FACILITY_NAME
PA-0400776
STREET_NUMBER
6125
Direction
E
STREET_NAME
QUASHNICK
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
STOCKTON
APN
08653002
ENTERED_DATE
12/28/2004 12:00:00 AM
SITE_LOCATION
6125 E QUASHNICK RD
RECEIVED_DATE
12/21/2004 12:00:00 AM
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
004
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\rtan
Supplemental fields
FilePath
\MIGRATIONS\Q\QUASHNICK\6125\PA-0400776\SU0004764\APPL.PDF \MIGRATIONS\Q\QUASHNICK\6125\PA-0400776\SU0004764\CDD OK.PDF \MIGRATIONS\Q\QUASHNICK\6125\PA-0400776\SU0004764\EH COND.PDF
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
38
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
The proposed General Plan Map Amendment appears to be inconsistent with these <br /> General Plan policies. If the General Plan Text Amendment is approved, and Morada is <br /> re-designated as a Rural Community, then the General Plan Map Amendment would be <br /> an expansion of a rural community into an agricultural area and policies would limit <br /> growth to infill. <br /> Location and Character of Development (Volume I, pp. IV-5) <br /> 2. Rural communities shall: <br /> (a) be planned to have minimal growth, mainly infill development with expansion <br /> discouraged; <br /> 6. Development should occur on vacant lots within existing communities as "infill" before <br /> extending beyond the current developed areas of a community. <br /> The proposed General Plan Map Amendment is inconsistent with Policy 2. (a) and <br /> 6. of the General Plan because it would expand Morada, and expansion of rural <br /> communities is discouraged. "Infill" development should occur on vacant lots <br /> within Morada prior to expansion of the community of Morada. <br /> Location and Character of Development (Volume I, IV-13) <br /> 13. General Plan Amendments: <br /> (b) In reviewing General Plan 2010 Map Amendments to convert land from <br /> agricultural uses to non-agricultural urban uses, the following criteria should be <br /> used for evaluation: <br /> • The merits of the proposed project and the availability of comparable <br /> alternative sites in areas already designated for urban uses; <br /> The project site is surrounded by existing residential and agricultural <br /> designated and developed lands. <br /> • The potential for the project to create premature development pressure on <br /> surrounding agricultural lands; <br /> If approved, this could serve as the impetus for future requests to expand <br /> the community of Morada into adjacent agriculture areas. As previously <br /> discussed, lands north and east of the community of Morada are to remain <br /> in agriculture. (Volume Il, X-25) <br /> • The classification of the property in the Important Farmlands Inventory Systems. <br /> The project site is designated as "Prime Farmland". Development of this <br /> project site would result in the loss of 51 acres of Prime Farmland. <br /> Summary <br /> The proposed General Plan Text Amendment does not appear to be consistent with <br /> General Plan policies. Morada has areas designated R/VL (Very Low Density- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.