Laserfiche WebLink
1.Approach and Scope of Work <br /> Assumptions <br /> The applicant will provide ESA with site-specific existing data,to the extent <br /> available/relevant,potentially including a Phase I Environmental Site <br /> Assessment, Phase I1 programs documentation, and compiled hazards <br /> database searches(such as a previously completed EDR report), if available. <br /> ESA assumes that full database searches will not reveal existing <br /> contamination on the project site.If existing contamination is identified on <br /> site,additional documentation and environmental review may be required, <br /> which would be outside the purview of this scope,and could require <br /> additional effort/budget. <br /> Hydrological, Flooding and Water Quality <br /> Issues <br /> The project site is located within the watershed of the San Joaquin River,in <br /> the vicinity of the eastern boundary of the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta. <br /> Hydrology on site at present is likely dominated by agricultural irrigation <br /> during the summer months,and stormwater flows during the winter months. <br /> Drainage on site is currently provided by a series of agricultural drains that <br /> eventually merge with the South San Joaquin Irrigation District(SSJID) <br /> agricultural drainage and flood control facilities,located off site. A <br /> preliminary review of FEMA flood maps indicates that the project site is not <br /> located in or adjacent to a 100-year flood zone.These drains discharge into <br /> the San Joaquin River/Delta. <br /> Our preliminary research indicates that no water quality data are available on <br /> site or for waterways that are in close proximity to the project site.However, <br /> the portion of the San Joaquin River located downstream of the project site is <br /> included on the Central Valley Regional Water Quality Control Board's <br /> (CVRWQCB)2006 303 (d)List of Water Quality Limited Segments, for the <br /> following constituents: electrical conductivity,boron,mercury,DDT, Group <br /> A pesticides, and toxaphene. <br /> During the scoping process, SSJID expressed concern regarding potential <br /> discharges from the project site into SSJID's drainage facilities, and <br /> indicated that the applicant would need to conform to SSJID's current policy <br /> for stormwater drainage and drainage infrastructure updates, including <br /> completion of storm drainage calculations as warranted and adherence to <br /> specific construction schedules and design standards. SSJID also requires <br /> that any existing on-site irrigation or storm drainage infrastructure needed to <br /> provide irrigation or storm drainage to SSJID's service area should not be <br /> moved or removed unless alternate, functional facilities are installed. Finally, <br /> i <br /> 1-22 San Joaquin County-E!R for the Union Pacific Modernization Project <br />