My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SU0008325
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
T
>
THORNTON
>
15300
>
2600 - Land Use Program
>
PA-1000131
>
SU0008325
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/7/2020 11:33:27 AM
Creation date
9/9/2019 10:36:40 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2600 - Land Use Program
RECORD_ID
SU0008325
PE
2626
FACILITY_NAME
PA-1000131
STREET_NUMBER
15300
Direction
N
STREET_NAME
THORNTON
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
LODI
Zip
95240
APN
02519016 18 19
ENTERED_DATE
6/28/2010 12:00:00 AM
SITE_LOCATION
15300 N THORNTON RD
RECEIVED_DATE
6/24/2010 12:00:00 AM
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
004
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\rtan
Supplemental fields
FilePath
\MIGRATIONS\T\THORNTON\15300\PA-1000131\SU0008325\APPL.PDF \MIGRATIONS\T\THORNTON\15300\PA-1000131\SU0008325\CDD OK.PDF \MIGRATIONS\T\THORNTON\15300\PA-1000131\SU0008325\EH COND.PDF \MIGRATIONS\T\THORNTON\15300\PA-1000131\SU0008325\BOS APPEAL.PDF
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
226
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Environmental Impact Report Alternatives Assessment for the proposed Lodi, Calffbmia,Love's Trevel Stops Project <br /> Memorandum January 28,2013 <br /> Alternative 1: No Project Alternative <br /> Consistent with California Environmental Quallty Act (CEQA) guidelines, the DEIR includes a No <br /> Project alternative. Under this alternative, the Project would not proceed. In the short term, the <br /> Project site would remain vacant. In the long term, however, the DEIR anticipates the Project <br /> site would be developed with any land use permitted under the current zoning for the site (C-FS, <br /> Commercial-Freeway Services). Any other land uses would require a General Plan amendment <br /> or rezoning and are not considered reasonable, given the adjacent commercial land use <br /> designations. <br /> Alternative 1 Feasibility Assessment <br /> The No Project alternative does not meet any of the stated Project objectives, which are based <br /> on the construction and operation of a truck stop to serve existing travelers and truck traffic on <br /> SR 12 and 1-5. <br /> Alternative 2: Reduced Project Size <br /> The Reduced Project Size alternative is defined as development of a truck stop that is half the <br /> size of the proposed Project. Specifically, the Reduced Project Size alternative proposes 12 fuel <br /> dispensing pumps: 8 for passenger cars and 4 for trucks. In addition, this alternative proposes <br /> a convenience store that would be reduced to 3,850 square feet, a fast-food restaurant that <br /> would be reduced to 1,500 square feet, and a storage building that would be reduced to <br /> 600 square feet. <br /> Alternative 2 Feasibility Assessment <br /> The Reduced Project Size alternative conflicts with the Project objectives of developing a <br /> property of sufficient size to accommodate a truck and auto fuel dispensing area, emergency tire <br /> repair and replacement services, convenience store, and fast-food restaurant to create a regional <br /> traffic stop; providing a facility of sufficient size to capture overflow overnight truck parking; and <br /> providing a travel stop facility of sufficient size to capture overflow overnight truck parking. <br /> This alternative would use approximately half of the Project site, leaving the remaining acreage <br /> (approximately 5.8 acres) to be developed with additional conforming land uses (i.e., <br /> commercial-freeway services) that typically are high-intensity uses (e.g., hotels, gas stations, <br /> fast-food restaurants). Any future commercial development on the remaining half of the site <br /> likely will result in environmental impacts (e.g., traffic, air pollution, greenhouse gas emissions) <br /> that are equal to or greater than the proposed Project, given the proposed Project's low-intensity <br /> usage of a majority of the site. As estimated in Omni-Means'trip generation analysis, traffic <br /> impacts under the Reduced Project Size alternative have the potential to be equal to the <br /> proposed Project (in the event another travel stop is developed on the remaining land) or greater <br /> than the proposed Project (in the event retail uses are developed on the remaining land), <br /> resulting in the same or significantly deteriorated level of service (LOS) conditions at evaluated <br /> intersections, respectively, relative to the LOS conditions of the proposed Project. <br /> Reducing the number of fuel dispensing pumps and the size of the convenience store and fast- <br /> food restaurant will have a small effect on the project footprint, which is primarily comprised of <br /> truck and passenger car parking. <br /> Economic&Planning Systems,Inc. 4 v:uaaoomunss:corcnwsmp�rss cw.d•wvsr m,mos-u.ee< <br /> EXHIBIT 1 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.