My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SU0008325
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
T
>
THORNTON
>
15300
>
2600 - Land Use Program
>
PA-1000131
>
SU0008325
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/7/2020 11:33:27 AM
Creation date
9/9/2019 10:36:40 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2600 - Land Use Program
RECORD_ID
SU0008325
PE
2626
FACILITY_NAME
PA-1000131
STREET_NUMBER
15300
Direction
N
STREET_NAME
THORNTON
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
LODI
Zip
95240
APN
02519016 18 19
ENTERED_DATE
6/28/2010 12:00:00 AM
SITE_LOCATION
15300 N THORNTON RD
RECEIVED_DATE
6/24/2010 12:00:00 AM
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
004
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\rtan
Supplemental fields
FilePath
\MIGRATIONS\T\THORNTON\15300\PA-1000131\SU0008325\APPL.PDF \MIGRATIONS\T\THORNTON\15300\PA-1000131\SU0008325\CDD OK.PDF \MIGRATIONS\T\THORNTON\15300\PA-1000131\SU0008325\EH COND.PDF \MIGRATIONS\T\THORNTON\15300\PA-1000131\SU0008325\BOS APPEAL.PDF
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
226
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
. i <br /> Environmental Impact Report Alternatives Assessment for the proposed Lodi, California, Love's Travel Stops Project <br /> Memorandum January 28, 2013 <br /> Further, a large portion of the proposed Project is being developed to accommodate trucking <br /> customers. As such, the site has been sized and configured to allow trucks to safely maneuver <br /> around the Project and to park to adhere to"hours of service"regulations. Love's explored <br /> alternative configurations to use less acreage and determined there were no other feasible site <br /> configurations that would maintain required operational and safety considerations. <br /> Alternative 3: Alternative Use—Combination Gasoline Station <br /> The Combination Gasoline Station alternative proposes a reduced, 12-pump fuel dispensing area <br /> in combination with a convenience market. The gasoline station would serve passenger cars and <br /> lighter trucks but would not serve heavy-duty trucks. Although the fuel dispensing area Is <br /> reduced from the proposed 24 fuel stations, this analysis presumes the convenience market <br /> would not be reduced in size relative to the 7,700-square-foot market in the proposed Project.6 <br /> This alternative omits the fast-food restaurant. <br /> Alternative 3 Feasibility Assessment <br /> The Combination Gasoline Station alternative conflicts with the Project objectives of constructing <br /> a Love's truck stop to serve existing travelers and truck traffic; developing a property of <br /> sufficient size to accommodate a truck and auto fuel dispensing area, emergency the repair and <br /> replacement services, convenience store, and fast-food restaurant to create a regional traffic <br /> stop; providing a facility of sufficient size to capture overflow overnight truck parking; and <br /> providing a travel stop facility of sufficient size to capture overflow overnight truck parking. <br /> The Combination Gasoline Station alternative does not conform to Love's business model, which <br /> includes serving heavy-duty trucks and providing a fast-food restaurant. Specifically, Love's <br /> business model is to develop a travel stop that combines a fuel dispensing area, convenience <br /> store, and fast-food restaurant if the project Is located outside of their home base geographic <br /> area. There are two factors underlying this approach. First, high G&A costs associated with the <br /> management oversight of projects outside of their home base geographic area require the profit <br /> margins of all three uses combined (fuel dispensing area, convenience store, and fast-food <br /> restaurant) to achieve economic viability. Second, a project that excludes or reduces the <br /> amount of parking or fuel dispensing pumps would limit Love's ability to effectively use the <br /> Project in their market efforts to their trucking customer base. <br /> This alternative would use less acreage than the proposed Project site, leaving the remaining <br /> acreage to be developed with additional conforming land uses (i.e., commercial-freeway <br /> services) that typically are high-intensity uses (e.g., hotels, gas stations, fast-food restaurants). <br /> Any future commercial development on the remainder of the site likely will result in <br /> environmental impacts (e.g., traffic, air pollution, greenhouse gas emissions) greater than the <br /> proposed Project, given the proposed Project's low intensity usage of a majority of the site. As <br /> estimated in Omni-Means'trip generation analysis, traffic impacts under the Combination <br /> Gasoline Station alternative have the potential to be greater than the proposed Project(in the <br /> event a gas station or retail uses are developed on the remaining land), resulting in significantly <br /> 6 The September 2012 DEIR does not specify if the convenience market would be reduced under this <br /> alternative. <br /> Economic&Planning Systems,Inc. rot Ot4B-13.tlx <br /> EXHIBIT 1 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.