SU0008325 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

The Grupe Company Page 2 January21,1013 The building sizes associated with development of the remaining undeveloped areas of the project site under each altemative, as shown in Table 1 were calculated based upon a 0.25 Floor Area Ratio (FAR) and rounded as necessary for land use type.Based upon this FAR factor, approximately 127,125 sq.ft.of area is available for new buildings under Alternative 1, approximately 63,598 sq. ft. of area is available for new buildings under Alternative 2,approximately 113,583 sq.ft. of area is available for new buildings under Alternative 3, and approximately 116,495 sq. ft. of area is available for new buildings under Alternative 4. TRIP GENERATION CALCULATIONS After determining the land use area and remainder of land assumed undeveloped under each alternative, trip generation estimates associated with full development of the site was completed Table 2 contains the daily,AM peak hour and PM peak hour trips for the proposed project and each alternative as contained in M- TABLE 2 TRIP GENERATION tProposed Project Trips 11.68 ares 4,532, 306 331 Altemative 1:No Project 0 acres — — — `Altemative2:Reduced Project 5.84 acres 2,266 153 l91 1.25 acres l Altennative 3:Combination Gas Station (12 Fueling Station) 11950 122 ifil Alternative 4:Retail with Fest Food Restaurant 0.98 ages 2,276 176 182 As identified in the next section of this report, trips associated with development of the remaining undeveloped portions of the site were added to the trips contained Table 2 to yield trip generation estimates associated with frill development of the site for each alternative.For Alternatives 2,3,and 4,the remainder of land for each alternative was assumed to be developed under two options.Option 1 assumed the same land use as proposed under each EIR alternative. Option 2 assumed a"reasonable worse case" retail trip generation condition consistent with CEQA as allowed under the current CF-S zoning. Under Alternative 1 no additional development was assumed for Option 1, and development of the entire site was assumed for Option 2. Analysis was performed to calculate trip generation for each of these options for each alternative,along with associated impacts. ALTERNATIVE 1:NO PROJECT Option 1:No Project Option 1 assumes no development of the remainder of the land and is limited to those uses that are "allowed by right under the CF-S zoning", namely a small group care facility with a maximum of six occupants. Based upon the significantly lower trip generation compares with the proposed travel stop project, this alternative would result in a significantly lesser impacts regarding intersection LOS conditions as compared to the proposed project LOS conditions. Option 2:Retail use for IL 68 site Option 2 assumes retail uses for the entire 11.68 acre site and does not assume the small group care EXHIBIT 2